Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 29, 2:17 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/29/10 2:13 PM:
...
Are you trying to argue that the former contains truth and the
latter needn't?
(be careful. Snit... this path is fraught with pitfalls
LOL!
I am noting
You forgot the 'h'
Poor Snit... now he's trying to argue that "proof beyond a reasonable
doubt" doesn't need to contain any true statements from which a
deduction can be made.
LOL!
--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch