GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

Snit

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/29/10 2:32 PM:

....
Are you trying to argue that the former contains truth and the
latter needn't?

(be careful. Snit... this path is fraught with pitfalls

LOL!

I am noting, Steve, that you have struggled and confused two concepts for
years (since 2003):

* Proof: as in that found in a mathematical proof, an absolute concept
* Proof: as in adjudication, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"

And from this you jump to asking what I am "arguing". Nothing - I am noting
a fact. You have confused the two concepts *today* with your rants. Today.

You forgot the 'h'

Poor Snit... now he's trying to argue that "proof beyond a reasonable
doubt" doesn't need to contain any true statements from which a
deduction can be made.

You have struggled and confused two concepts for years (since 2003):

* Proof: as in that found in a mathematical proof, an absolute concept
* Proof: as in adjudication, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"

And from this you jump to asking what I am "arguing"... and then insisting
you know what I am "arguing" (once again you are telling people what they
think). To the contrary, I am merely noting a fact. You have confused the
two concepts *today* with your rants as you have done repeatedly since 2003.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]