On 12/1/10 12:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 1, 3:42 am, Women should rule the world!!!!
wrote:
It is true that "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" does not need to
contain anything for which a true statement can be made
If the thing you are labeling "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"
contained no truth to it at all then it wouldn't prove anything to any
sane, honest and honorable person.
Put the crack pipe down, Snit.
Let Snit smoke jis crack, it will take his mind off incest for a while.