Snit wrote:
Women should rule the world!!!! stated in post
on 12/1/10 3:33 AM:

Some tiny-dicked mere male wrote:

when there has not been a one true thing
established from which something else can necessarily follow.

Hey, Carol, since when does something have to be true for some other
thing to necessarily follow?

Some thing can be 100% false and some thing can still necessarily
follow.

Logic 101 for ****wits
======================
Truth is not a necessary condition of some thing to follow since it
is possible for the thing to be true without the condition that
follows being true.

Logic is short suit, right?

Kissy! Kissy!

Steve has been showing his complete ignorance about logic since at
least 2003. He is obsessed with convincing people that I am wrong to
say people who are actually guilty are not always found guilty in any
process of adjudication.

In a legal context actually guilty is the same as being found guilty.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch