"Billy" wrote in message
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote:
"Billy" wrote in message
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote:

fbi-falafel-watchlist

Fran, try
http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2007/11/fbi-hoped-to-fo.html

Thanks Billy. That article says much the same as every other thing I've
managed to find out on this - the only 'factual' bit is the mention of a
few
names. There is no report of arrests of hundreds of people anywhere.

Just because someone comes up with a 'bright' idea doesn't mean it'll
fly. I
still have grave doubts that it did fly but it may have glided for a
short
distance till it went further up the bureacratic dung heap till it got to
Mason who had enough sense to see it was a crock of an idea.

Good news, Bad news: the Good news is that the L.A. Times gave their
source as the Congressional Quarterly. Bad news is that the
Congressional Quarterly is a private publication, that requires a
subscription to read it :O))

And those 3 names given, and which are as close as I can get to any 'facts'
about humus buyer targetting, are the same ones mentioned everywhere and are
probably also all from exactly the same 'source'.

There just is not enough 'evidence' to claim that anything of the sort
happened.

The telling point is that no American doubts the report. I think that we
are all screwed. I'm hoping that's just me.

LOL. That isn't saying a lot Billy. Americans seem to be more paranoid
about their own government than any other group of people on earth except
for those of the old Soviet Union - perhaps a hang over them the 1950s