View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Old 23-02-2011, 06:33 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible,rec.gardens
Billy[_10_] Billy[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,438
Default Why Arenšt G.M.O. Foods Labeled?

In article
,
Big Country wrote:

On Feb 20, 12:46*pm, wrote:
Billy writes:
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...g-m-o-foods-la
beled/?partner=rss&emc=rss


FEBRUARY 15, 2011, 9:00 PM
Why Aren t G.M.O. Foods Labeled?
By MARK BITTMAN

...
It's unlikely that these products potential benefits could possibly
outweigh their potential for harm.


As gardeners, most of us have no problem with selective breeding.
We're happy to alter a plants genetic makeup through artificial
(human assisted) selection.

GMO is artificial selection on steroids. *It's really directed
change vs. random change.

Opponents say that GMO is unnatural and that selection could
NEVER produce the results obtained with GMO.

Seems to me, that's short sighted. *Selective breeding might be
1000s or even millions of times slower than GMO but a mutation is
a mutation. *There is no theoretical limit to what can be accomplished
with selective breeding. *It's just going to take a longer time.

You can breed salmon genes into a tomato with selective breeding?
Take longer indeed, salmon and tomatoes sprang from eukaryotic cells,
which evolved 1.6*2.1 billion years ago, and developed along completely
different lines (Plant Kingdom, Animal Kingdom).

Compare a wolf to a Great Dane to a Chihuahua. *Pretty radical change
there. *All done by humans in a relatively short amount of time.

That's not to say I'm 100% comfortable with crossing Poison Ivy and
Kudzu. *We don't want super weeds released into the environment.

Also I'm not comfortable with patents on living organisms but that
occurs now with artificial selection, it's not unique to GMO.

As far as labeling GMO foods, I'm not concerned at all.
Selected crops aren't labeled as such. *If the GMO results in
something in the food that wouldn't be there naturally, then the
food should be labeled. *For example, the extra component could
cause an allergy. *People should know if they are eating something
different. *But if GMO just makes the crop bigger or more drought
resistant, I can see no need for special labeling.

Just my opinion.


Thanks for the INfo


Just remember, there have been NO feeding trials. We are the guinea
pigs. No one knows if a particular GMO is good. We do know that Arpad
Pusztai's GM potatoes killed lab rats.
--
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower, 16 April 1953
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw