View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old 05-04-2011, 12:01 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
Billy[_10_] Billy[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,438
Default Fish Fertilizer and saving fish stock

In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

In article
,
Billy wrote:

In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

In article ,
Doug Freyburger wrote:

Bill who putters wrote:

Strange thought entered my mind concerning the tragedy in Japan.
With
the higher levers do radiation entering the ocean. With this make
the
fish unsuitable for harvesting and will this enable the fish
populations
to have a long respite ?

Probably not. The ocean is too big so dilution works. The isotopes
have short enough halflives that the radiation will fade very quickly.
The current situation is a huge mess but the effects will remain more
local than what happened at Chernobyl. There will be more of a move
farther away from shore by Japanese fishermen but that's nothing new -
They are hunting whales in the Antarctic Ocean already now.

Approaches that work for DDT and mercury will work exactly the same
way for the small amounts of long life isotopes - Eat lower on the food
chain. Plant eating fish over predator fish, squid over fish, small
critters over large critters. Conveniently this approach also helps
fish populations.

Anyone know about the ramifications ?

Far more likely to have impact on land industry than sea industry. No
shift from fossil fuel to nuclear so increased strip mining in coal
belts. Increased CO2 release. And no change in the exponential growth
curve of installed solar cells so the good promise on that front is not
effected. Given how industrious the Japanese have been in the past
they
will recover, rebuild and be back near the top sooner than most expect.

Old news but be sure to look at the radio nuclide issues down in the
article. Deals with increase of back ground radiation.

http://www.edwardgoldsmith.org/page37.html


Got Hope? Got Seed? Got a Clue?

So, are you better off now than you were 10 years ago?
Are you better off now than you were 30 years ago, when we were
introduced to the "Laugher's Curve"?

Me neither.


What is the "Laughers Curve" ?


It's the economic joke that Reagan pulled on the U.S. Sometimes spelled
by the less humorous as "Laffers Curve", it is supposed to justify
"Trickle Down" economics, a.k.a. "VooDoo economics". The theory was that
there was an optimum level that would generate the most revenue. The
irony is that America was at its most prosperous between 1947 and 1964
when progressive tax rates went as high as 91% to 70%.



Bush's 3rd term: Obama




If you like weekends (8 hr./day & 40 hr./week), then thank a labor union.
They paid for it in blood.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haymarket_affair

Jobs not Wars
===
--
- Billy
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower, 16 April 1953
http://wn.com/black_panther_party
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_vN0--mHug