"DogDiesel" wrote:
"Billy" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

In article
,
Billy wrote:

In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

In article ,
Doug Freyburger wrote:

Bill who putters wrote:

Strange thought entered my mind concerning the tragedy in Japan.
With
the higher levers do radiation entering the ocean. With this
make
the
fish unsuitable for harvesting and will this enable the fish
populations
to have a long respite ?

Probably not. The ocean is too big so dilution works. The
isotopes
have short enough halflives that the radiation will fade very
quickly.
The current situation is a huge mess but the effects will remain
more
local than what happened at Chernobyl. There will be more of a
move
farther away from shore by Japanese fishermen but that's nothing
new -
They are hunting whales in the Antarctic Ocean already now.

Approaches that work for DDT and mercury will work exactly the same
way for the small amounts of long life isotopes - Eat lower on the
food
chain. Plant eating fish over predator fish, squid over fish,
small
critters over large critters. Conveniently this approach also
helps
fish populations.

Anyone know about the ramifications ?

Far more likely to have impact on land industry than sea industry.
No
shift from fossil fuel to nuclear so increased strip mining in coal
belts. Increased CO2 release. And no change in the exponential
growth
curve of installed solar cells so the good promise on that front is
not
effected. Given how industrious the Japanese have been in the past
they
will recover, rebuild and be back near the top sooner than most
expect.

Old news but be sure to look at the radio nuclide issues down in the
article. Deals with increase of back ground radiation.

http://www.edwardgoldsmith.org/page37.html

Got Hope? Got Seed? Got a Clue?

So, are you better off now than you were 10 years ago?
Are you better off now than you were 30 years ago, when we were
introduced to the "Laugher's Curve"?

Me neither.

What is the "Laughers Curve" ?

It's the economic joke that Reagan pulled on the U.S. Sometimes spelled
by the less humorous as "Laffers Curve", it is supposed to justify
"Trickle Down" economics, a.k.a. "VooDoo economics". The theory was that
there was an optimum level that would generate the most revenue. The
irony is that America was at its most prosperous between 1947 and 1964
when progressive tax rates went as high as 91% to 70%.



And government spending was 10% of now.

And Europe and Asia was rebuilding their nations and buying lots of US made
goods during the post war years. I see the world and within the US as a
zero sum game. Others misery is a blessing to others. However, the planets
resources is past the breaking point so I see greater misery for many.

Now I will double and triple check my sources of vitamins. Fish and fish
oils vitamins from the North Atlantic will be my first choice. Many vitamin
manufactures are from Japan.

--
Enjoy Life... Nad R (Garden in zone 5a Michigan)