Thread
:
Scent v perfume v fragrance
View Single Post
#
9
13-06-2011, 01:05 AM posted to rec.gardens
Brooklyn1
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2010
Posts: 713
Scent v perfume v fragrance
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:55:25 -0700, Billy
wrote:
In article ,
Frank wrote:
On 6/12/2011 6:26 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:02:48 -0400, Frank
wrote:
On 6/12/2011 5:34 PM,
wrote:
writes:
I often find the terms are very loosely used and confusing.
What do you guys think?
I always think of.........
Scent: something that you can only smell If you sniff a flower directly.
eg, primroses.
Fragrance: is stronger than scent and can be smelled without sniffing a
flower directly, say in passing close to a plant. eg, roses.
Perfume: Is the srongest and can be smelled from a good distance away.
eg honeysuckle.
I think you meant to post in alt.english.usage.
???
That's what I was thinking.
A skunk has a scent and can be smelled from a good distance away, but
you would not call it a perfume
Wouldn't that be aroma... and I don't mean some unbathed dago! lol
Lot of us aren't fond of you either.
Bordering on intolerant.
Ask me if I care what yoose Life-Of-The-Party pointy headed imbeciles
think... not that yoose are capable of thinking... especially you,
Bullylgoat Schtink. Notice your initials...
Reply With Quote
Brooklyn1
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Brooklyn1