View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old 06-08-2011, 10:37 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
Gunner[_3_] Gunner[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2010
Posts: 330
Default U/C Berkeley 2008

On Jul 31, 10:42*pm, Billy wrote:
In article
,

*Gunner wrote:
In general, only a small number of peer-reviewed studies exist that
analyze nutritional differences between foods produced conventionally
and organically. Although statistically significant differences have
been observed for a limited number of metabolites for a few foods
grown under differing environmental conditions using conventional and
organic production systems, more research is required to determine if
any of these differences have actual health-promoting effects. Some
examples......


Blah, blah, blah. Even you, Gunny, ought to be embarrassed at all the
weasel words above. When you look at it, closely, you can see that it
means nothing.


You like to reframe alot don't you, but still .....Prove her wrong
Asshole!

Since you can't... you just talk shit like you are now. Show how many
peer-reviewed studies exist that
analyze nutritional differences between foods produced conventionally
and organically.

There is a lot of money in GMOs, but none in crop rotation.Hummmm???.


That is the best you come up with? Another lame attempt alluding to
the grand conspiracy that denied you ! You are a little paranoid twit
aren't you? Don't think you are a Luddite but you play one very well
here in the anonymity of the Internet.

There is a lot of money in the organic pseudo science you fringe
sophists harp on. Yet you still cannot dispute her with anything
resembling logic. Crop rotation? really billy ? Is that like your
BS statement mineral fertilizers kill soil? YOur Ironite lawsuit you
didn't research before you make your false statement?

Get it through your fat head. Just because the dot.coms give you your
cherry picked pseudo science leads, they are not valid, but you know
that. RU still stupidly sticking to your

U still betting on your 2000 internet book report to be accurate?. I
would love to see attempt to school Dr Lemeux with your pseudo
science and your sole source use of book writers as experts. You lack
integerity as well as balls.

Your still a fringe jerkoff lost in the 60s again. 2 lines of comments
surrounded by 50 lines of political BS. Youve never been anywhere nor
done anything in your miserable little Walter Mitty life except now
you have the Internet in your old cripple life and you feel you must
share your doom and gloom with every one.