Martin Brown wrote in
:

On 02/11/2011 13:47, Baz wrote:
wrote in

:

On Nov 1, 6:27 pm, wrote:
wrote
innews:e91712d0-0d10-42e2-a200-1000df8a
:

On Nov 1, 1:01 pm, wrote:
Try as I might to find it, I have lost this discussion.

Would someone kindly give me, or point me to the topic header or
thread please.

Thanks
Baz
Get yourself a proper news reader.Here you a-

https://groups.google.com/group/uk.r...se_thread/thre
ad /3
b07c21688af7f13/117fd2d33f1eb9b1?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=runner+beans+par
rot#11
7fd2d33f1eb9b1

I have a "proper" newsreader, YOU don't.

Baz

If you used Google groups you would have no trouble finding things
like this.
Much more user friendly.
I have an old news reader too (eternal september/outlook express).
Complete s**t, outdated.


Look.
I don't use google groups, I never have and never will, I use my
ISP's quite complete set of newsgroups, always have done so. I have a
real newsreader too.(xnews can be your next imaginary friend)

Google groups is extremely useful for looking up old prehistoric
threads. It was more useful in its older incarnation as DejaNews.

My question/request failure is due to my mistake and I had lost the
thread. My request has been replied to and I have found the
neccessary information.

Thanks

Baz

But a quick search on Google groups would have done that easily.


OK. End of.
I really don't have the time or inclination to point you at the real
reason we use REAL newsreaders. I am sure you will get it eventualy. Most
probably not after reading and re-reading your slavver.

Baz