On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:27:24 AM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:49:01 -0700 (PDT), Ken

wrote:





What untrue in the same way those involved in illegal wars designed to further the political and economic ambitions of the US, are being referred to as "heros"?







What is untrue and libelous is the claim "... and in common with the



others around about 75% of these revenues will be directed to "admin



costs" "



If you can prove this statement either put up or shut up.



I wonder if you would be able to provide full details of any of the sovereign states which have been attacked by UK forces in the last 10 years say, that posed any sort of direct threat to either the security or the people of the UK?



Which is totally irrelevant



So you can't justify your allegations.. Better get yourself a good

lawyer. You are going to need one.

--



Martin

I would have thought terrorist attacks being paid for by cash strapped UK taxpayers is very much relevant to those paying the cost!