On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:46:11 GMT, "David Kendra"
wrote:

I would suspect that the Syngenta wheat did not contain RR technology. It
was a plant health/food safety trait.

Hello David, long time no see. Of course you are right,
it is a Fusarium resistance trait.

Jim Webster and Gordon Couger has just managed to show that
they do not know what they f... they are talking about.

If they had interest in GM wheat they would've known that
Syngenta does not haven anything to whatsoever with RR wheat.
Indeed if they had done the bare minimum, to bother reading
the mail that initiated the thread they would have known this
is not about RR wheat.

You may not believe it but I have missed you.


"Gordon Couger" wrote in message
news:3ea664a3_2@newsfeed...

"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"Michael Percy" wrote in message
s.com...
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:00:50 +0100, Jim Webster wrote:

so the first they they do is spray the crop with roundup, the
organic
wheat dies, the RR wheat continues

RR wheat in a ... Syngenta! trial ... Hello?

Mike

I merely quote from the source of all knowledge, Marcus


I don't know if the wheat is RR wheat or not.

All the players in GM crops license their technology. The deal won't work
if
they don't. In China Monsanto gave China license to the BT gene to get the
right to sell BT cotton there. Monsanto was so much more successful with
their cotton that China has barred foreign investment in their bio
technology industry early this year.

Monsanto's seed was more expensive than Chinese's BT cotton but farmers
bought the best seed they could get and it wasn't Chinese.

This year Monsanto has a better BT protien in their cotton than the first
generation. It won't make me much difference but the guys in the south
were
they have more worm problems will go for it. And they will probably use it
in Arizona and New Mexico to see if they can kill out the pink boll worm.

Gordon

Gordon