Thread: In a rush
View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old 26-02-2013, 05:44 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible
Billy[_12_] Billy[_12_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 243
Default In a rush

In article ,
Rick wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:31:34 +1100, "David Hare-Scott"
wrote:

songbird wrote:
Rick wrote:
...
I've seen a lot of "pro-metric" posts in various places lately.
Being a scientist I readily convert back and forth. Still I have a
fondness for pecks, bushels, quarts and pints etc. I'd rather have
a pint of beer than 475 mls (well OK a pint is only 473.176473 ml)
g. When cooking it's cups and teaspoons for me- at the bench,
grams and microliters...

pint is a varied measure. isn't it the Brits who
use 20fl oz for the pint?


songbird


Yes but their fluid oz is a different size so all is right with the world.
Of course if we had been talking about a pint of beans the volume would have
been different from beer.

To show that serious drinkers have it sorted out across the atlantic a
traditional whisky bottle in the US is the same volume as in the UK, being a
fifth of a gallon and a sixth of a gallon respectively. To make things easy
the former is called a fifth, the latter would be a sixth, right? No the
latter is a reputed quart.

Strangely a litre is the same anywhere in the world whatever you measure
with it. How weird is that!

David


Actually, it depends on the temperature and atmospheric pressure. A
liter is only a liter under standard conditions. Interesting about
thw whisky bottle sizes. However if the British really get 1/6 gallon
they get over half a ml extra (under standard conditions of course)!


It would vary less than the "fill" in the bottle from your friendly
giggle-water producer, and even less than the "pour" from your
neighborhood publican.

--
Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg
or
E Pluribus Unum
Next time vote Green Party