Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and recovered
for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having carefully
avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift the topic. No
surprise. But the content is actually much the same, accusing your
perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you like the sound of
that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either your courage or your
knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive conversation, which is
it?

David