"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having
carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift the
topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much the same, accusing
your perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you like the
sound of that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either your
courage or your knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive
conversation, which is it?

The author of the nuclear diatribe is a Tea Bagger. 'Nuff said methinks.