"Farm1" wrote :

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
"David Hare-Scott" wrote :

Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.


http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having
carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift
the topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much the same,
accusing your perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants
you
like the sound of that you don't quite understand. No surprise.
Either
your courage or your knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive
conversation, which is it?

David

So harsh on someone who doesn't have blind faith in your religions of
"Man
Made Global Warming" and "No Nukes".

Harsh? As opposed to your use of 'environazis'?




What else would we call people who think that man must be eradicated, to
"save the earth" and that humans are a blight on the ecosystem instead of
being part of it? Who want to tax people to death and into ruin, to make a
0.1 degree temperature difference in 100 years, when the real agenda is
global socialism and to eliminate human civilization?