Billy wrote :

In article . 131,
Jane Galt wrote:

Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...-Matsumura-Liv
ing -in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...e-dried-meat-s
tic king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for
2 billion years.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Blah, blah, blah. If nuclear energy was safe, the investors in nuclear
energy wouldn't require that government underwrite their insurance. Got
to put your money where your big, fat mouth is, sweety.


Like I just said, the industry has been regulated and harassed with
lawsuits by environazis, nearly out of existence, yet it STILL generates
20% of U.S. electricity and 70% in France, which is a socialist nation. Why
would socialists have it generating 70%? Don't they want to "save the
earth"? Oh, why they must think it safe and clean.