Farm1 wrote:
"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
"Farm1" wrote :

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
"David Hare-Scott" wrote :

Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's
technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.


http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power,
having carefully avoided defending your errors about climate
change you shift the topic. No surprise. But the content is
actually much the same, accusing your perceived opposition of bad
faith and repeating chants you like the sound of that you don't
quite understand. No surprise. Either your courage or your
knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive conversation,
which is it?

David

So harsh on someone who doesn't have blind faith in your religions
of "Man Made Global Warming" and "No Nukes".

Harsh? As opposed to your use of 'environazis'?




What else would we call people who think that man must be
eradicated, to "save the earth" and that humans are a blight on the
ecosystem instead of being part of it? Who want to tax people to
death and into ruin, to make a
0.1 degree temperature difference in 100 years, when the real agenda
is global socialism and to eliminate human civilization?

You need help.


When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards....

D