View Single Post
  #62   Report Post  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:29 PM posted to rec.gardens
Billy[_10_] Billy[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,438
Default The Bright Side Of Global Warmth

In article . 131,
Jane Galt wrote:

Billy wrote :

In article . 131,
Jane Galt wrote:

Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...-Matsumura-Liv
ing -in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...e-dried-meat-s
tic king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for
2 billion years.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html


Blah, blah, blah. If nuclear energy was safe, the investors in nuclear
energy wouldn't require that government underwrite their insurance. Got
to put your money where your big, fat mouth is, sweety.


Like I just said, the industry has been regulated and harassed with
lawsuits by environazis, nearly out of existence, yet it STILL generates
20% of U.S. electricity and 70% in France, which is a socialist nation. Why
would socialists have it generating 70%? Don't they want to "save the
earth"? Oh, why they must think it safe and clean.


I don't have time to toilet train you.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Co...es-T-Z/USA--Nu
clear-Power/#.UYf2BIIZwnX
The USA is the world's largest producer of nuclear power, accounting for
more than 30% of worldwide nuclear generation of electricity.
The country's 104 nuclear reactors produced 821 billion kWh in 2011,
over 19% of total electrical output. There are now 103 units operable
and three under construction.
Following a 30-year period in which few new reactors were built, it is
expected that 4-6 new units may come on line by 2020, the first of those
resulting from 16 licence applications made since mid-2007 to build 24
new nuclear reactors.

So, where are the enviro-nazis? Nuclear power plants are alive and well.
Your blather about enviro-nazis is just fiction, just like your loose
pants hero, Ayn Rand used to write (Nathaniel Branden).

The Feds, the "corporations big sugar daddy" will only pay for their
mistakes after they are in excess of $12.5 billion.

2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami (Fukushima), Japan: estimated more
than $300 billion

Chernobyl disaster, 1986: $15 billion estimated cost of direct loss. It
is estimated that the damages could accumulate to ¤235 billion for
Ukraine and ¤201 billion for Belarus in the thirty years following the
accident.

Like the man said, a hundred billion dollars here, and a hundred billion
dollars there, and soon your talking real money.


Now why don't you get back on that turnip cart that you obviously fell
off of, and go some where where people might be dumb enough to believe
your lies, some place like Elbonia.

--
Remember Rachel Corrie
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg