On 6/5/2013 11:33 PM, Roy wrote:
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 9:18:40 PM UTC-6, Billy wrote:
In article ,

Roy wrote:



On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 11:21:35 PM UTC-6, Billy wrote:

In article ,



songbird wrote:







Billy wrote:



...







wonder how much nutrients this puppy sucks from



the soil?







it's gotta come from somewhere...











songbird







No report on how much nutrient it gives, either. However, it would be a



stretch to say it is worse than what we are already being given. At



least it won't have the potential allergens that are produced from GMOs.



Who on Earth came up with that BS statement "potential allergens that are

produced from GMOs"?...sounds like quite a stretch IME.



I'm just a spectator. What do you know?



http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...eticfood36.htm

--

Remember Rachel Corrie

http://www.rachelcorrie.org/



Welcome to the New America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg

Why would GMOs have any more propensity for causing allergic reactions than non-GMOs?

Blaming GMOs for everything that is bad for mankind and/or other animal
life seems to be a common trait amongst critics of GMO production
...purely guess-work and conjecture.


Someone speculated that development of non-flatulent cows to cut down on
green house gases may cause the end of the world. Who knows?