View Single Post
  #85   Report Post  
Old 08-11-2013, 03:10 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Jeff Layman[_2_] Jeff Layman[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,166
Default At the risk of being unpopular

On 07/11/2013 23:27, Sacha wrote:
On 2013-11-07 19:41:29 +0000, Roger Tonkin said:

Well Sacha, you certainly made this group come to life
today, revealing that there are many more lurkers(like
me) out there that only contribute occasionally.

I did subscribe a few weeks ago to a DIY group out of
curiousity (DIY is really a pet hate of mine - I just
get forced to do it!). I gave up after about a week,
as it was running at around 200 posts a day!

KEEP URG GOING I SAY


What seems to have got lost in all the brouhaha is that my original
idea was to keep urg going by suggesting people look for new topics to
discuss.


Well, maybe it's time to comment now that the blog appearance has been
dissected to oblivion. But a general comment on its content first.

I read the blog, and the trouble is that it was too long as it was
really a rant. Short rants are fine; long rants tend to make you turn
off half-way through. And it seemed to want to cover several subjects.
In then end I had trouble seeing the wood for the trees. Was it for or
against GW? Was it about getting children interested? Was it about
supporting nurseries and growers? Did it want more or less detail in GW
("If you are discussing the Chelsea Chop, go into it properly and talk
about the whole process or it makes no sense and it will go wrong", but
"And please never let any of us have to endure 6 minutes of how to jet
wash a path ever again!!". Why not? it's as much a part of gardening as
anything else done in that outside space. And, I don't remember it
being covered before in GW or urg. So there you are, a new subject!).

That's why I almost never read blogs. They are just someone else's
ideas on what I should be doing or thinking about. It's just a "When I
want your opinion I'll give it to you" statement.

I was interested in the point about getting children into gardening. I
suppose that some children may be interested, but I would guess that
children have a few other interests (other than the glass-faced tap and
drag machine). Other than planting a daffodil bulb, and getting a
runner bean seed to sprout, I can't remember doing anything relating to
plants when I was of primary school age. But then I was living in a
city in a house with a very small back-yard garden. I think I tried
growing some runner beans outside, but don't remember the outcome. But
there most certainly weren't the distractions then that kids have today.
We tended then to make (ie physically construct) our own
entertainment. Can you see /any/ kids doing that today? Their
entertainment comes ready-packed. Could they focus on one thing for
more than 20 minutes, unless it's a film or video game? It's probably
why sites like twitter are so successful - you only need a span of
attention of a few seconds, and that is in line with what most user's
limit is. The problem is that you can create anything in the virtual
world so easily with the minimum of effort. That's the attraction.

Look at the people walking round any NGS garden. They are all of, or
near, retirement age. If you see anyone below 50 they stand out like a
sort thumb. I must have been to over 50 gardens in the last 2 or 3
years, and even at the weekends never saw a child. But I didn't expect
to. I am not sure about the statement "...kids love to garden and are
naturals as they don't worry it might not work." How many kids love to
garden? A small minority I expect - probably less than a fraction of a
percent at best. The may seem to like gardening at school, but what
would be the alternative to the gardening hour? And how many kids have
the facilities to garden today, as house plots get smaller and smaller,
and the gardens proportionally more so, as far as I can see.

It would be interesting to see when the urg regular posters - and even
some or the lurkers - started gardening. With me, an interest in plants
started with a present by a friend of a couple of cacti, and I was near
30 at the time. It must have been another 5 years before I started
gardening in earnest.

So I don't think that there is much point in spending a lot of time
trying to get children involved in gardening. Those who are interested
will take it up and stay interested. Those who aren't will either never
take it up, or might later in life. Only then might they become urglers.

Rant over. Or should that be my #Shoutyhalfhour (whatever the # means)
over?! Did you stop reading half-way through? ;-)

There are only so many times one can be fascinated by a runner bean
failure, a lawnmower that doesn't, or mildew on Michaelmas daisies.
It's hardly any wonder numbers have dwindled to the downright pitiful.


I am sure that you actually mean "a select few"...

So please delurk, all you present lurkers and put in your two pennorth!


May I qualify that? Please add your comments, but only if you have
something to say. There are already enough posters here who waffle on
and on. Don't argue - I write as one with great experience!

--

Jeff