On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said:

On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge
wrote:

On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote:

I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted - therefore my
response needed to be cross-posted.

That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I needed to
as well'.

You don't *need* to crosspost.

Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to
crosspost between URG and URC


Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was
therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan - then moan
at the person who made the first cross-post.

Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter?

I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith' six
feet under?

You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope
the problem has taken care of itself. ;-)
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon