Another one six feet under
On 16/11/13 18:25, sacha wrote:
On 2013-11-15 23:54:18 +0000, RustyHinge said:
On 30/06/13 19:10, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:12:30 +0100, RustyHinge
wrote:
On 29/06/13 18:52, Judith in England wrote:
I was replying to a message which happened to be cross-posted -
therefore my
response needed to be cross-posted.
That's as logical as saying 'he put his head in the fire, so I
needed to
as well'.
You don't *need* to crosspost.
Crossposting does have its uses,but I see no creditable reason to
crosspost between URG and URC
Rubbish - the original post and claim was made in both groups - it was
therefore sensible to reply in both groups. If you want to moan -
then moan
at the person who made the first cross-post.
Why not get together with Sacha and change the charter?
I wonder what weed would sprout if we buried the so-called 'Judith'
six feet under?
You're replying to a post sent in late June, Rusty. For myself, I hope
the problem has taken care of itself. ;-)
Well, some posts in the thread has miraculously appeared in the undead
section at the bottom of the list.
And, er, because it was there.
--
Rusty Hinge
To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer and the BOFH.
|