Oh, come on! I bet you even believe that dinosaurs became extinct
without the help of man. grin

Wuffman wrote:

You obviously don't have a grsp of the situation... a fish that was put in
a man made resevore does not have any more rights to the water than the men
that use " some " of the water.... the fish is not on the endagered species
list...
or even on the threatened speciaes list... it was proven in a court of law
since then tha the average amount of water that is used by the farmers in
the basin would not be detrimental to the survival of the fish there...

Nature destroys way more of the enviroment each year than man has since adam
and eve walked out of the garden! Volcanoes and earth quakes and natural
forest fires do way more damage each year... Volcanoes spill tons of
poisionous gasses into our atmousphere...




"Steve Newport" wrote in message
...


I support conservation and being responsable with God's resources but not

at

the expense of a mans living....

Absolutely not. How dare people with conservation in their minds dare
endanger a mans living. So long as we make a living screw the
environment and all other considerations.

Your comment highlights a very important point. Conservation DOES
require sacrifice, even, god forbid, a mans living. Take a look back
over history and this will tell the story of mankind having to change
their living in order to survive. If protecting the environment means
we have to change the way we live then so be it.

To expect to preserve what is left of our natural world and NOT to
have to address and modify the way in which we live is simply to
deceive ourselves..

At the end of the day the world turns and things change, we have to
change too in order to protect the things we value.