View Single Post
  #39   Report Post  
Old 26-04-2003, 12:23 PM
Oz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Vegans, facts, ranting, bigotry and other related subjects....

Michael Percy writes
Oz wrote:

Michael Percy writes
Oz wrote:

Michael Percy writes
Oz wrote:

Michael Percy writes

Sub-humid.

What crops at what yield levels would you expect at this rainfall?

What ruminant production (if any).


Oh, the usual stuff. Llamas and pot :-) Come on,
you told me it was somewhere in central/east England.

Not much of an answer, is it?
Can't you do better?

I can be less kind. Give it up.


Why? Don't you have any idea?

Tsk, tsk.


Ok then don't give up, stand up for your questions instate.


OK so you admit you haven't a clue.

Your
questions assumes that the information 'water is available in possibly, but
not necessarily limiting amounts' is a predictor for which crops you
grow, the yields obtained, and your ruminant production.


In a dry year we will produce close to, sometimes slightly over, 4T/ac =
10T/Ha *providing* we get 1-2" a month (more like 1" each 3 weeks).
Rainfall august-october is irrelevant. 2" in october will pretty much
see us to spring, add another inch if you like.

Explain why you
think this is a reasonable assumption.


It's happened.

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted.