On Friday, March 7, 2014 4:31:45 PM UTC-8, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/7/2014 11:16 AM, Todd wrote:

On 03/06/2014 01:30 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:



First I note that you have changed the subject and presented no facts in

rebuttal (again).



Hi David,



I don't have to. If I have a pet theory, say the moon is

made out of cheese, it is my job to prove it to you, not

the other way around. If you think temperature is rising,

then you have to prove it to me.



The Climate Change crowd has not got squat. Their computer models

are so bad they couldn't predict the sun will rise the next day.

Plus, they have been caught falsifying their data. And, they

name call ("Deniers") anyone that "Dare" disagree with them.

And there is no open debate as they refuse to listen to

contradictory evidence, which is overwhelming.



And even though I don't have to, here you go:



http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...ling/page1.php



My guess, sun spot activity is far more responsible than

anything man can do. Ever see how much crap a volcano

spews into the atmosphere? Mankind is a piker!



Sea levels rising? Good luck proving that one.





Forget computer models.



Instead, talk to the almond growers in the Central Valley of California.

They have seen reductions in crops because their trees no longer get

sufficient winter chill. This has been going on for a few years now.



Also talk to the Canadian government. They are planning a new seaport

on their arctic coast to handle shipping through the North-West Passage.


David, why waste electrons on deniers of any stripe. They will always find "data" to support their bias. Even when global warming reaches up and bites them or their progeny in the posterior, their determination bias will burn fierce and strong (block that metaphor g)

HB