Todd wrote:
On 03/06/2014 01:30 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:

First I note that you have changed the subject and presented no
facts in rebuttal (again).

Hi David,

I don't have to. If I have a pet theory, say the moon is
made out of cheese, it is my job to prove it to you, not
the other way around. If you think temperature is rising,
then you have to prove it to me.

The Climate Change crowd has not got squat. Their computer models
are so bad they couldn't predict the sun will rise the next day.
Plus, they have been caught falsifying their data. And, they
name call ("Deniers") anyone that "Dare" disagree with them.
And there is no open debate as they refuse to listen to
contradictory evidence, which is overwhelming.

And even though I don't have to, here you go:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...ling/page1.php

From your reference.

"So the new Argo data were too cold, and the older XBT data were too warm, and
together, they made it seem like the ocean had cooled," says Willis. The
February evening he discovered the mistake, he says, is "burned into my memory."
He was supposed to fly to Colorado that weekend to give a talk on "ocean
cooling" to prominent climate researchers. Instead, he'd be talking about how
it was all a mistake.