Field Forester Needed - Bevan Forestry
"Joe Zorzin" wrote in message ...
"Chris Tcimpidis" wrote in message . .. Bevan Forestry, based in Sullivan County, New York State, USA, is currently searching for a person to fill a new forestry/technician position. This is an entry level position and is ideal for a recent college graduate with a technical degree or professional degree and technical degree. Please contact Bevan Forestry at 845-439-4909 or for further information. Just curious, but I assume you're a consulting firm? If so, please stick around here and throw in your 2 cents on the many issues we talk about here. What's your web page URL? I was browsing through the Forestry Guild's site in the certification listings and saw their entry. Could be a good way for us to learn about "real" certification, Joe. I wonder if the USFS couldn't become "certified" and start getting more return for Federal logs, instead of being dirt-cheap. Larry Or are you a logging firm pretending to be a forestry firm? If so, that's naught. G Joe Zorzin |
Field Forester Needed - Bevan Forestry
snip
I was browsing through the Forestry Guild's site in the certification listings and saw their entry. Could be a good way for us to learn about "real" certification, Joe. I wonder if the USFS couldn't become "certified" and start getting more return for Federal logs, instead of being dirt-cheap. Wouldn't that be a kick - the feds timber program submitting to outside agency, science based referees! Wait a minute - isn't that what happens anyway? Except that the science part is still up in the air? Actually, the state of Washington DNR IS considering it. If FSC wasn't so expensive, it would probably be a shoo-in. |
Field Forester Needed - Bevan Forestry
"Michael Hagen" wrote in message ... snip I was browsing through the Forestry Guild's site in the certification listings and saw their entry. Could be a good way for us to learn about "real" certification, Joe. I wonder if the USFS couldn't become "certified" and start getting more return for Federal logs, instead of being dirt-cheap. Wouldn't that be a kick - the feds timber program submitting to outside agency, science based referees! Wait a minute - isn't that what happens anyway? Except that the science part is still up in the air? Actually, the state of Washington DNR IS considering it. If FSC wasn't so expensive, it would probably be a shoo-in. The state of Mass. is now under evaluation for FSC certification. Karl Davies and I and a few others bitched to the company doing the work and they met with us and we filled their ears with some juicy stuff. G I recently emailed their head honcho and asked how the review was coming- they're almost done, then it will go to their "peers". When I heard that, I chewed him out since his peers will be more academics and high level Forest Circus guys. Karl then chewed him out over the fact that no academics or USFS honchos have a &^%$#@ clue. The review panel and the "peers" of that panel should have included guys from the REAL world. It's costing the taxpayers of Mass. about $150,000 for the FSC review- for the half million acres they MISMANAGE. JZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter