Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cutting down the forest for the trees
http://www.berkshireeagle.com/Storie...035387,00.html
Article Last Updated: Saturday, December 07, 2002 - 12:18:27 AM MST Cutting down the forest for the trees Just over the Vermont line from Rowe is a vast lowland forest called Lamb Brook, filled with giant beech and maple trees that provide food for bears and shelter for migratory songbirds. A few years ago, the U.S. Forest Service proposed to open up this part of the Green Mountain National Forest to logging, but an immense popular outcry and a successful lawsuit in federal court by a local environmental group, Green Mountain Forest Watch, saved Lamb Brook. For a little while, anyway. Anyone who's taken a driving trip out west has seen the way the national forests are managed there, whole hillsides scalped to the bare earth for mile after mile and replanted as tree farms. In Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, the hillsides are greener. The difference lies in citizen participation. The National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, requires decisions on the national forests, including the writing of the "forest plans" that govern their use, to be open to citizens. Out west, the timber industry dominates the process. Here, more people live near the forests and prefer to use them for recreation. Now, a seemingly innocuous rules change proposed by the Bush administration would take away the rights of citizens to intervene in timber sales and hand the timber industry a mandate to clear-cut the national forests. The U.S. Department of Agriculture official in charge of the Forest Service is Mark Rey, a former timber industry lobbyist. He has found a loophole in NEPA that exempts decisions with no environmental impact, like painting the outhouses at rest areas, from public review. Rey's clever idea was to expand that loophole to the writing of forest plans, so they could be rewritten to favor logging over environmental protection and citizens would have no right to object. There has been a tremendous outcry from environmental groups, which would be completely frozen out, and even from the Forest Service's own scientists, whose recommendations are being ignored. Sadly, there's little anyone can do. As a rules change, the measure doesn't have to go through Congress. There will be a 90-day comment period, after which the Bush administration is free to ignore the comments. This is no reason not to comment. The administration ended its bid to lower arsenic standards in drinking water after a huge public outcry, so write everyone from the supervisor of the Green Mountain National Forest to the White House. And go see Lamb Brook while you still can. Heading north out of Heartwellville, the hard-to-spot trailhead is on the north side of Route 100. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cutting down Cypress trees (cheaply and easily!) | Gardening | |||
[IBC] Cutting Down Trees | Bonsai | |||
Cutting Down Tree - Planning Permission? | United Kingdom | |||
Cutting Down Tree - Planning Permission? | United Kingdom | |||
Newbie question: Need advice on tools for cutting down overgrown backyard | Lawns |