http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?opt...ticides-report

Interesting.

In article ,
ask@itshall says...
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?opt...ticides-report

Interesting.



Indeed.

Good link.

phorbin wrote:
In article ,
ask@itshall says...
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?opt...ticides-report

Interesting.



Indeed.

Good link.

People were worried about the impact on the broader gene pool by GM crops
due to possible horizontal transfer, this shows that simple selction
pressure will do it instead. Evolution is very powerful and doesn't
necessarily take millions of years, it is best to have such forces on side
and not to go head to head.

The nineteenth century attitude that mankind is the pinacle of creation and
born to subjugate the world in any way he sees fits is still alive and well.
How long is it going to take to learn that manipulating just one aspect of a
living system instead of trying to deal with the whole thing is likely to
lead to unexpected and probably unwanted consequences.

David

In article ,
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote:

http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?opt...d=11699 :key-
findings-from-gm-and-pesticides-report

Thanks. The site puts lots of information in one place.
--
³When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.²
-Archbishop Helder Camara

http://tinyurl.com/o63ruj
http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm

FarmI wrote:
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?opt...ticides-report

Interesting.


VERY interesting.

--
Jean B.