Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Check this shit out.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Check this shit out.
"DogDiesel" wrote in message ... Which potato do you want to eat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=exBEFCiWyW0 13 most toxic vegetables. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVu53...eature=related chemicals are making us fat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pen1i...h_response_rev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Check this shit out.
In article ,
Derald wrote: "DogDiesel" wrote: Which potato do you want to eat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=exBEFCiWyW0 I'm not an advocate of the arbitrary use of chemicals in or on foods but I have to wonder where is the link to the youtube video explaining the differences between science and alarmist propaganda; or to the one pointing out the questionable morality of using school-aged children to promulgate uncritical advocacy. Is there a youtube video that deals with the ruthlessly relentless indoctrination of school children under the banner of "education" or one explaining exactly how advocacy groups function as de facto religions? I rather doubt any exist because rational thought is not the point, is it? http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...tto+on+educati on&aq=3&oq=john+taylor+gatto -- Bill S. Jersey USA zone 5 shade garden "The best fertilizer is the gardener's shadow." - Anon http://honest-food.net/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Check this shit out.
In article ,
Derald wrote: "DogDiesel" wrote: Which potato do you want to eat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=exBEFCiWyW0 I'm not an advocate of the arbitrary use of chemicals in or on foods but I have to wonder where is the link to the youtube video explaining the differences between science and alarmist propaganda; And you do? Considering that the U.S. in 2 wars, plus 2 half wars (Yemen/Libya), it would appear that the difference between truth and alarmist propaganda is lost on most Americans. or to the one pointing out the questionable morality of using school-aged children to promulgate uncritical advocacy. What was uncritical? She bought 3 different sweet potatoes, stuck them in water, and we observed the results. Then she identified a difference between them as being chlopropham. Maybe you would like a peer review process? When most students have their interest in science beaten out of them by grade 11, I found it very refreshing that she had a question, did the test, and then reached a conclusion. If you want to rail about education, try railing against "No child's behind left", which has no education, but only rote memorization. Now, in a technological age, college is being placed beyond the financial reach of most students. Only the rich need apply. Is there a youtube video that deals with the ruthlessly relentless indoctrination of school children under the banner of "education" or one explaining exactly how advocacy groups function as de facto religions? I rather doubt any exist because rational thought is not the point, is it? The school-aged child had data to support her position. Being chronologically an adult, what do you have [facts, logic + premise]? While you may be suspect of the girls conclusions, the different sweet potatoes spoke volumes without her assistance. -- http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...mical-controls April 2010, Scientific American p. 30 Chemical Controls As the law stands, the EPA cannot be proactive in vetting chemical safety. It can require companies to test chemicals thought to pose a health risk only when there is explicit evidence of harm. Of the 21,000 chemicals registered under the law's requirements, only 15 percent have been submitted with health and safety data--and the EPA is nearly powerless to require such data. The law allows companies to claim confidentiality about a new chemical, preventing outside evaluation from filling this data gap; some 95 percent of new submissions fall under this veil of secrecy. Even when evidence of harm is clear, the law sets legal hurdles that can make action impossible. For instance, federal courts have overturned all the EPA's attempts to restrict asbestos manufacture, despite demonstrable human health hazard. Consequently, of the more than 80,000 chemicals in use in the U.S., only five have been either restricted or banned. Not 5 percent, five. The EPA has been able to force health and safety testing for only around 200. (cont.) -- http://www.allvoices.com/contributed...d-takes-on-gen etically-modified-food-producers-video -- - Billy Mad dog Republicans to the right. Democratic spider webs to the left. True conservatives, and liberals not to be found anywhere in the phantasmagoria of the American political landscape. America is not broke. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It's just that it's not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/.../michael-moore /michael-moore-says-400-americans-have-more-wealth-/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Major SAAB! Kicking the shit out of General Motors. | Ponds | |||
help id plants...check out pearling pics too | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
check out my new aquarium website! :) | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
check it out | Lawns |