About Us

18-12-2003, 11:42 PM

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:03:56 GMT,
(Babberney) wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:57:41 GMT, Strider wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:30:36 -0800, "Rico X. Partay"
wrote:

"Bob Peterson" wrote in message
...

Junk science is junk science.

Saying "it's too political so it must be wrong" is the same as
saying "it's wrong because it's wrong." It's a completely
conclusory, content-free statement you're making.

Adherence to scientific methods do not allow for politics. Insertion
of politics into science will bias the results of any study.

Strider
Do you therefore believe that good scientists are apolitical, or that
only conservative scientists are able to keep from injecting their
politics into their work? Either way, you are not convincing me so

Good science is apolitical.

Facts are gathered, a theory is advanced, and if the theory is found
to explain the facts the theory is accepted until further facts
support or contradict it.

Junk science starts with a theory and then selectively accumulates
facts to support the theory. Inconvenient facts are ignored in the
pursuit of proving the theory.

Good scientists are not necessarily apolitical, but proper adherence
to the science and the facts does not allow for the insertion of
political dogma. If you start with the theory, the dogma is built in.

Most of the junk science being promoted these days is coming from the
far left nutballs and the far right religious nutballs. Most of the
press for the junk science goes to the far left nutballs.

far . . . .

Keith

For more info about the International Society of Arboriculture, please visit http://www.isa-arbor.com/home.asp.
For consumer info about tree care, visit http://www.treesaregood.com/

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
"Left wing kookiness"	Rico X. Partay	Gardening	182	22-04-2004 08:02 PM
Extreme left-wing kookiness (was Self-Suffiency Acreage Requirements)	Jonathan Ball	Edible Gardening	17	21-12-2003 05:43 PM
Extreme left-wing kookiness (was Self-Suffiency Acreage Requirements)	Jonathan Ball	Gardening	17	21-12-2003 05:42 PM
"Left wing kookiness" (was: Self-Sufficiency...?)	Rico X. Partay	Gardening	5	19-12-2003 02:32 AM
"Left wing kookiness", and dissembling carpet-munchers	Jonathan Ball	Gardening	0	18-12-2003 08:42 PM

Menu

About Us