|
algae, spectrum, light
It is by no means inconcievable that different organisms are sensitive
to different areas of the spectrum. be aware though that unless your light looks red or orange, there is blue in it! |
algae, spectrum, light
It is by no means inconcievable that different organisms are sensitive
to different areas of the spectrum. be aware though that unless your light looks red or orange, there is blue in it! |
algae, spectrum, light
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...6481.Bc.r.html
This one is interesting because it says that photosystems in plants can ONLY use red light. The photosynthetic pigments absorb light at different wavelengths and 'down-convert' it to red light. This includes things from trees all the way down to blue-green algae! |
algae, spectrum, light
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...6481.Bc.r.html
This one is interesting because it says that photosystems in plants can ONLY use red light. The photosynthetic pigments absorb light at different wavelengths and 'down-convert' it to red light. This includes things from trees all the way down to blue-green algae! |
algae, spectrum, light
Algae and aquatic plants can use both blue and red wavelengths and
everything in between. Algae and plants both live and grow in water less than 3 feet, the issue of blue wavelengths are not that great when dealing with the average tank. Turbidity will remove all wavelenghts not just blue and this is common in a number of natural systems. Tannins will selectively remove certain wavelenghts. Both algae and plant both possess Chl a as their final energy transfer molecule before splitting the water for e-'s and H+'s. There are two special Chl a's called *P680 and *P700. Chl b, c, d, and all the other pigments like beta carotene etc only use wavelenghts that are higher energy (shorter wavelengths). These lose energy and relax down to the lower energy levels and are funnels into these final transfer molecules. Lower than 700 nm are not usable by plants or algae. You cannot go "uphill" so to speak. All the enegy from these assessory pigments are transferred via resonance to the reaction center Chl a molecules. Some bacteria can use longer waveleghts and have only a single reaction center molecule instead of a pair like Chl a. But algae and plants can alter and change their ratios of these pigments to catch whatever is being offered. You can change the colors but you often will get the same algae or a new species to fill it's place. Blue light responses in plants allows more CO2 since the stomata open even larger when the plant is exposed to blue and better growth occurs and it looks better to our eye if the color is well balance. You get a more efficient watt to quantum yield of plant growth if you stay close to the Chl a's spectrum but, the plant can handle most things you throw at it. Same goes for the algae. They are _extremely_ similar biochemically. You gain no advantage by using so call plant bulbs that "reduce algae". If they can show practical evidence in a plant tank this occurs, I'd love to see it. Otherwise it is pure speculation and I think , BS. I've used all sorts of colors and have found nothing that would indicate a better final steady state that give any advantage to the plants vs the algae. After about one month both algae and plants have adapted to whatever color temps/wavelenght you have provided for them. At the light level, algae and plants are too close to make any use of this and algae can live on a order of magnitude of less light than higher plants. Waste of money IMO/IME but what your eyes precieve how the plants appear in certain light color is something to consider. A 10000K 40w bulb will grow plants. But you get less useful light since the higher wavelenght will need to lose some energy before it makes it down to the reaction center. The excess energy can be given off as fluorescence, heat etc. A warmer red colored bulb with a blue spike will give the best preformence but the light will all funnel down to the same place. But as far as useable light energy, the 660-700 range is great watt for watt. Looks ugly and the blue spike will open stomata more and make things look better also. 5000-6700K looks good, Triton's 7500K look good and the 8800K bulbs look good also. I use 4300K bulbs in MH's and also 6500K's. Get temps in these ranges and your fine. Good color for your eye and the plant's needs. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
Algae and aquatic plants can use both blue and red wavelengths and
everything in between. Algae and plants both live and grow in water less than 3 feet, the issue of blue wavelengths are not that great when dealing with the average tank. Turbidity will remove all wavelenghts not just blue and this is common in a number of natural systems. Tannins will selectively remove certain wavelenghts. Both algae and plant both possess Chl a as their final energy transfer molecule before splitting the water for e-'s and H+'s. There are two special Chl a's called *P680 and *P700. Chl b, c, d, and all the other pigments like beta carotene etc only use wavelenghts that are higher energy (shorter wavelengths). These lose energy and relax down to the lower energy levels and are funnels into these final transfer molecules. Lower than 700 nm are not usable by plants or algae. You cannot go "uphill" so to speak. All the enegy from these assessory pigments are transferred via resonance to the reaction center Chl a molecules. Some bacteria can use longer waveleghts and have only a single reaction center molecule instead of a pair like Chl a. But algae and plants can alter and change their ratios of these pigments to catch whatever is being offered. You can change the colors but you often will get the same algae or a new species to fill it's place. Blue light responses in plants allows more CO2 since the stomata open even larger when the plant is exposed to blue and better growth occurs and it looks better to our eye if the color is well balance. You get a more efficient watt to quantum yield of plant growth if you stay close to the Chl a's spectrum but, the plant can handle most things you throw at it. Same goes for the algae. They are _extremely_ similar biochemically. You gain no advantage by using so call plant bulbs that "reduce algae". If they can show practical evidence in a plant tank this occurs, I'd love to see it. Otherwise it is pure speculation and I think , BS. I've used all sorts of colors and have found nothing that would indicate a better final steady state that give any advantage to the plants vs the algae. After about one month both algae and plants have adapted to whatever color temps/wavelenght you have provided for them. At the light level, algae and plants are too close to make any use of this and algae can live on a order of magnitude of less light than higher plants. Waste of money IMO/IME but what your eyes precieve how the plants appear in certain light color is something to consider. A 10000K 40w bulb will grow plants. But you get less useful light since the higher wavelenght will need to lose some energy before it makes it down to the reaction center. The excess energy can be given off as fluorescence, heat etc. A warmer red colored bulb with a blue spike will give the best preformence but the light will all funnel down to the same place. But as far as useable light energy, the 660-700 range is great watt for watt. Looks ugly and the blue spike will open stomata more and make things look better also. 5000-6700K looks good, Triton's 7500K look good and the 8800K bulbs look good also. I use 4300K bulbs in MH's and also 6500K's. Get temps in these ranges and your fine. Good color for your eye and the plant's needs. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
bowing down before Tom
We're not worthy! We're not worthy! getting up off of the floor What *do* you do for a living Tom? You have to be one of the most knowledgable plant people who roams the Internet. Are you a biologist or botanist? |
algae, spectrum, light
bowing down before Tom
We're not worthy! We're not worthy! getting up off of the floor What *do* you do for a living Tom? You have to be one of the most knowledgable plant people who roams the Internet. Are you a biologist or botanist? |
algae, spectrum, light
Ron Kundla wrote in message . ..
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...6481.Bc.r.html This one is interesting because it says that photosystems in plants can ONLY use red light. The photosynthetic pigments absorb light at different wavelengths and 'down-convert' it to red light. This includes things from trees all the way down to blue-green algae! That's the deal Neil. The down conversion means that only shorter wavelengths than 680 and 700 nm will be used. These are higher energy. All those other pigments absorb higher energy wavelengths (smaller/shorter wavelenghts). Plants and algae can change these pigments to maximize their capture of light. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
Ron Kundla wrote in message . ..
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...6481.Bc.r.html This one is interesting because it says that photosystems in plants can ONLY use red light. The photosynthetic pigments absorb light at different wavelengths and 'down-convert' it to red light. This includes things from trees all the way down to blue-green algae! That's the deal Neil. The down conversion means that only shorter wavelengths than 680 and 700 nm will be used. These are higher energy. All those other pigments absorb higher energy wavelengths (smaller/shorter wavelenghts). Plants and algae can change these pigments to maximize their capture of light. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
What *do* you do for a living Tom? You have to be one of the most
knowledgable plant people who roams the Internet. Are you a biologist or botanist? A botanist or biologist? How about both. I'm a grad student. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
What *do* you do for a living Tom? You have to be one of the most
knowledgable plant people who roams the Internet. Are you a biologist or botanist? A botanist or biologist? How about both. I'm a grad student. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
So the presence of these other pigments allows a plant to utilitze a
wider range of visible light wavelengths to power photosynthesis? Would this imply that a plant would be more efficient in its photosynthesis in the red range versus any of the others? The photosynthesis action spectrum seems to show that certain blue wavelenghts provide higher photosynthesis rates than red wavelengths. Am I completely messed up here? On 21 Feb 2003 14:14:18 -0800, ) wrote: That's the deal Neil. The down conversion means that only shorter wavelengths than 680 and 700 nm will be used. These are higher energy. All those other pigments absorb higher energy wavelengths (smaller/shorter wavelenghts). Plants and algae can change these pigments to maximize their capture of light. Regards, Tom Barr |
algae, spectrum, light
So the presence of these other pigments allows a plant to utilitze a
wider range of visible light wavelengths to power photosynthesis? Would this imply that a plant would be more efficient in its photosynthesis in the red range versus any of the others? The photosynthesis action spectrum seems to show that certain blue wavelenghts provide higher photosynthesis rates than red wavelengths. Am I completely messed up here? On 21 Feb 2003 14:14:18 -0800, ) wrote: That's the deal Neil. The down conversion means that only shorter wavelengths than 680 and 700 nm will be used. These are higher energy. All those other pigments absorb higher energy wavelengths (smaller/shorter wavelenghts). Plants and algae can change these pigments to maximize their capture of light. Regards, Tom Barr |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter