Stargazer
 

Sorry I goofed. here is the 2nd pic.
Jim

Stargazer
 

What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.

Stargazer
 

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.

1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
Sue ]:(:)

Stargazer
 

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.

1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
Thanks, it hesitatated so long I though it might be huge. I am using
DSL from lousy Verizon and it is a PITA.

Stargazer
 

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
I like the whole thing. The butterfly too.

Stargazer
 

Thank you for the comment. First try at posting ( I'm Old ), I'll get my 50
yr. old son to give me a lesson.
Jim in Surrey

"joevan" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
I like the whole thing. The butterfly too.

Stargazer
 

"Mad Cow" wrote in message ...

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.

1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
Sue ]:(:)

Thanks for your comments Sue. First try at posting and I'm Old, I'll get my
son to give me a lesson.

Jim in Surrey