Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning. before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me. I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks. I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add. I would really appreciate this. Any feed back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...ing/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

symplastless wrote:
Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning. before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me. I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks. I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add. I would really appreciate this. Any feed back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...ing/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.



Overall, the page is somewhat attractive. It would be more so if a
consistent font size were used.

Proofread your text. For example, you have a link with the text "Trees
(Generating Verses Regenerating Systems)". I think you mean "versus",
not "verses".

The page took a while to load. Like almost half the Internet users in
the U.S. (per a study by the Government Accountability Office), I use a
dial-up modem. I suggest you create a separate page for each major
topic. Then, the main page should have a link to each of those pages
with a BRIEF paragraph about the topic.

The page has 12 HTML errors according to http://validator.w3.org/. To
reach the broadest audience, it should comply with the W3C specifications.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.

David

How can I find out about the link problem?

John


"David E. Ross" wrote in message
.. .
symplastless wrote:
Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning. before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me. I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks. I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add. I would really appreciate this. Any feed
back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...ing/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding
us
that we are not the boss.



Overall, the page is somewhat attractive. It would be more so if a
consistent font size were used.

Proofread your text. For example, you have a link with the text "Trees
(Generating Verses Regenerating Systems)". I think you mean "versus",
not "verses".

The page took a while to load. Like almost half the Internet users in
the U.S. (per a study by the Government Accountability Office), I use a
dial-up modem. I suggest you create a separate page for each major
topic. Then, the main page should have a link to each of those pages
with a BRIEF paragraph about the topic.

The page has 12 HTML errors according to http://validator.w3.org/. To
reach the broadest audience, it should comply with the W3C specifications.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.

The only link problem I cited was the text for the link ("versus", not
"verses"), not the link itself.

symplastless wrote:
David

How can I find out about the link problem?

John


"David E. Ross" wrote in message
.. .
symplastless wrote:
Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning. before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me. I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks. I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add. I would really appreciate this. Any feed
back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...ing/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding
us
that we are not the boss.


Overall, the page is somewhat attractive. It would be more so if a
consistent font size were used.

Proofread your text. For example, you have a link with the text "Trees
(Generating Verses Regenerating Systems)". I think you mean "versus",
not "verses".

The page took a while to load. Like almost half the Internet users in
the U.S. (per a study by the Government Accountability Office), I use a
dial-up modem. I suggest you create a separate page for each major
topic. Then, the main page should have a link to each of those pages
with a BRIEF paragraph about the topic.

The page has 12 HTML errors according to http://validator.w3.org/. To
reach the broadest audience, it should comply with the W3C specifications.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.




--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.

Thanks David I fixed that. Thank you for your time.

John
"David E. Ross" wrote in message
.. .
The only link problem I cited was the text for the link ("versus", not
"verses"), not the link itself.

symplastless wrote:
David

How can I find out about the link problem?

John


"David E. Ross" wrote in message
.. .
symplastless wrote:
Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning. before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me. I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks. I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add. I would really appreciate this. Any feed
back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...ing/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep
reminding
us
that we are not the boss.


Overall, the page is somewhat attractive. It would be more so if a
consistent font size were used.

Proofread your text. For example, you have a link with the text "Trees
(Generating Verses Regenerating Systems)". I think you mean "versus",
not "verses".

The page took a while to load. Like almost half the Internet users in
the U.S. (per a study by the Government Accountability Office), I use a
dial-up modem. I suggest you create a separate page for each major
topic. Then, the main page should have a link to each of those pages
with a BRIEF paragraph about the topic.

The page has 12 HTML errors according to http://validator.w3.org/. To
reach the broadest audience, it should comply with the W3C
specifications.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.




--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Natural foods can be harmful: Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.