Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Left wing kookiness"
Don wrote:
WOW! You took that poor boy to the woodshed, but good! Uh...no; no, donny, he didn't do anything of the kind. bobby's idée fixe (look it up, you monolingual doofus) is that economics is a "subset" of psychology. It is not, and he couldn't possibly show that it is. That some economists have latterly become interested in some aspects of psychology does not support his silly and wrong claim. Read what I wrote in reply to bobby. Oh, wait; you're lowbrow moron, too, so you won't understand a word of it. In a nutshell, the development of economics as an academic discipline PREDATES the development of psychology. That is not to say that philosophers weren't already thinking of psychology long before it became a separate discipline, but it is one of the reasons economics, which emerged as a separate discipline long before psychology did, is not a "subset" of psychology. bobby is a moron, and you have bet on the wrong horse. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Left wing kookiness" (was: Self-Sufficiency...?) | Edible Gardening | |||
"Left wing kookiness" | Edible Gardening | |||
Extreme left-wing kookiness (was Self-Suffiency Acreage Requirements) | Edible Gardening | |||
"Left wing kookiness" (was: Self-Sufficiency...?) | Gardening | |||
"Left wing kookiness", and dissembling carpet-munchers | Gardening |