| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Asian disaster-off topic but necessary
There are times when an 'off topic' topic is necessary. I feel this is one
of those times. I sent the following message to the Premier of my province. Should you feel the same way I do then you will know what to do. These people need help and they need it now. Not tomorrow-now. Gary Fort Langley, BC Canada Mr. Premier There are many problems in your office that require 'looking after'. The problems in the aftermath of the disaster resulting in the earthquake in the Indian Ocean must take precedent. I send this message to you because I don't know who else to contact. The people there need help now! Not tomorrow but now. And they need it now in large numbers....large and immediately spread over a vast area. It is a massive problem! I can only hope that the 'ones' in 'charge' feel the same sense of urgency that I feel. And that they are able to meet the necessary requirements. Gary Davis Fort Langley, BC |
Feeling quite helpless on the other side of the planet, I've given $100.00
to Medicine Sans Frontieres (http://www.msf.org) they already have Doctors, support staff, and medicine on the ground in Aceh. It's a great organization, in my opinion, with the vast majority of one's contribution going towards actual relief and very little for 'overhead'. The American wing of this organization is 'Doctors Without Borders' (http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/). They make online donations very easy, and of course it's tax deductible. Dave "gary" wrote in message ... There are times when an 'off topic' topic is necessary. I feel this is one of those times. I sent the following message to the Premier of my province. Should you feel the same way I do then you will know what to do. These people need help and they need it now. Not tomorrow-now. Gary Fort Langley, BC Canada Mr. Premier There are many problems in your office that require 'looking after'. The problems in the aftermath of the disaster resulting in the earthquake in the Indian Ocean must take precedent. I send this message to you because I don't know who else to contact. The people there need help now! Not tomorrow but now. And they need it now in large numbers....large and immediately spread over a vast area. It is a massive problem! I can only hope that the 'ones' in 'charge' feel the same sense of urgency that I feel. And that they are able to meet the necessary requirements. Gary Davis Fort Langley, BC |
No, it's not necessary. Post your bedwetting whiny crap elsewhere.
Maybe those idiots will finally install some detection equipment. Now that's necessary. As for the lives lost, I think the (old Jay Leno) Doritos ad said it best- Don't worry, they'll make more. P.S. Anyone else notice that it took just three days for someone to figure out a way to blame the US for it? |
John Thomas wrote:
Maybe those idiots will finally install some detection equipment. As I understand it, the project is underway, but will not be active until sometime in 2005. |
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:10:35 -0500, Chelsea Christenson
wrote: John Thomas wrote: Maybe those idiots will finally install some detection equipment. As I understand it, the project is underway, but will not be active until sometime in 2005. If you are referring to a tsunami detection system in the Indian Ocean I understand that there are no plans but it is being discussed now. The issue is that this is an expensive system to detect an event that has not occurred in recent history (until last Sunday). Developing countries are not inclined to spend big sums to protect against such remote threats. It has nothing to do with intelligence. In fact, it is logical. Unfortunately, logic does not control natural events and thus disasters happen. Hysterical demands "to do something" invariably result in a waste of scarce resources. Similarly, there is no Atlantic Ocean system to protect the eastern US coast. There are no "big" fault zones in the Atlantic like those that exist in the Pacific, hence a reduced, but non-zero, tsunami threat. At least, that is what the scientists say. I expect that will also be subject to renewed debate. I only hope that a thoughtful debate trumps the political pressure. Sigh. John |
John Bachman expounded:
If you are referring to a tsunami detection system in the Indian Ocean I understand that there are no plans but it is being discussed now. The issue is that this is an expensive system to detect an event that has not occurred in recent history (until last Sunday). I heard that the head of the Australian government is looking into funding this system (now). -- Ann, Gardening in zone 6a Just south of Boston, MA ******************************** |
Quote:
|
I have to agree. If they have any schooling at all I cant understand why they dont
1. teach about hazards like earthquakes, tsunami, fires, etc. 2. teach every child to swim. many of the people drowned because they couldnt swim well enough to a tree or something between waves. during waves nothing can be done. but I doubt it takes 2 hours. I heard that the warning goes out immediately when quakes over 5(?) are recorded. they dont wait for an actual tsunami to be seen. sorta like doppler radar showing "signature" triggers the alarm horns going off. Ingrid Eyebright wrote: what i heard was a detection system would take 2 hours to come up with a warning and since land masses in the indian ocean where much closer together than in the pacific the wave would hit before or at about the same time as the warning could be issued....what i also heard was if you are ever at the coast and the sea suddenly goes out a very long way for no apparent reason don't call your freinds and family over to come and look, instead run away very fast. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
Sometimes ancient wisdom is the best. I have read that one of the strongest
"taboos" of the native Hawaiian culture involved the danger of turning one's back to the ocean. (I'm guessing they had a similar one about sleeping on or near the beach). Obviously observation had taught them valuable lessons which were inculcated in future generations via the mechanism of religion. (I imagine something similar dictated many of the Jewish dietary laws). " what i heard was a detection system would take 2 hours to come up with a warning and since land masses in the indian ocean where much closer together than in the pacific the wave would hit before or at about the same time as the warning could be issued....what i also heard was if you are ever at the coast and the sea suddenly goes out a very long way for no apparent reason don't call your freinds and family over to come and look, instead run away very fast. -- Eyebright |
Obviously observation had taught them valuable lessons which were inculcated
in future generations via the mechanism of religion. (I imagine something similar dictated many of the Jewish dietary laws). BRBR Actually, not many of the kosher laws are known to stem from health observations. Ancient people did not have the statistical mechanisms available today. According to one theory, pigs are not kosher because they were worshipped by the Egyptians. Recent studies have found that dairy products & meat eaten together are harder to digest, but the kosher prohibition against eating milk with meat stems from a line in the Bible: "You shall not boil a kid in its mother's milk." This is said to be out of respect for the mother goat's feelings, since you just killed her baby. Poultry was not considered "meat" until a rabbinic decision in the Seventeenth Century. Iris, Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40 "A tree never hits an automobile except in self defense." - Woody Allen |
as somebody who is a microbiologist and who started doing grad work in parasitology,
kosher laws are right on with respect to what is wholesome and healthy food. I am sure it has nothing to do with scientific analysis and everything to do with how people learn what foods are edible and which arent, and a lot to do with the wisdom of "old wives" which are much maligned. Ingrid (Iris Cohen) wrote: Obviously observation had taught them valuable lessons which were inculcated in future generations via the mechanism of religion. (I imagine something similar dictated many of the Jewish dietary laws). BRBR Actually, not many of the kosher laws are known to stem from health observations. Ancient people did not have the statistical mechanisms available today. According to one theory, pigs are not kosher because they were worshipped by the Egyptians. Recent studies have found that dairy products & meat eaten together are harder to digest, but the kosher prohibition against eating milk with meat stems from a line in the Bible: "You shall not boil a kid in its mother's milk." This is said to be out of respect for the mother goat's feelings, since you just killed her baby. Poultry was not considered "meat" until a rabbinic decision in the Seventeenth Century. Iris, Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40 "A tree never hits an automobile except in self defense." - Woody Allen ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
|
In article , Christopher Green
wrote: On 01 Jan 2005 13:45:11 GMT, (Iris Cohen) wrote: Obviously observation had taught them valuable lessons which were inculcated in future generations via the mechanism of religion. (I imagine something similar dictated many of the Jewish dietary laws). BRBR Actually, not many of the kosher laws are known to stem from health observations. Ancient people did not have the statistical mechanisms available today. According to one theory, pigs are not kosher because they were worshipped by the Egyptians. The dietary laws are indeed cultic rather than health oriented. But another theory re. pigs is that boars were once sacred to Adonai (a Semitic plural that means "Plethora of Adonises" implying a dying-&-reborn fertility daemon akin to Tamuz/Damuzi). The Adonai/Adonis myth that survived among the Greeks is of Semitic origin & was adopted by the Greeks via Phoenicia & Assyria. Adonis was slain by a boar & dwelt one season with Persephone in the dark realm, one with Aphrodite above ground, & the rest of the year where he pleased. It's a close parallel to the Damuzi myth of the western Semitic tribes, among whom Abraham was born. So just as Atargatis worshippers would not eat fish which were sacred to Atargatis, so too Adonai worshippers would not eat pigs or boars which were sacred to Adonai. This theory has the stronger likelihood because Jews did not ban the eating of animals sacred to other deities or they wouldn't be able to eat any meat at all, but the theory that the pig was once sacred to Adonai has less appeal to practicing monotheists who deplore the possibility that Yahweh/Adonai has his origin in the same place as all other deities: human myth & imagination. As a gardening topic, when Adonis died beneath the very pine tree that had long before given birth to him, transient windflowers or anemones sprang up from drops of his blood. -paghat the ratgirl -- "Of what are you afraid, my child?" inquired the kindly teacher. "Oh, sir! The flowers, they are wild," replied the timid creature. -from Peter Newell's "Wild Flowers" Visit the Garden of Paghat the Ratgirl: http://www.paghat.com |
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:15:34 GMT, Christopher Green
wrote: On 01 Jan 2005 13:45:11 GMT, (Iris Cohen) wrote: Obviously observation had taught them valuable lessons which were inculcated in future generations via the mechanism of religion. (I imagine something similar dictated many of the Jewish dietary laws). BRBR Actually, not many of the kosher laws are known to stem from health observations. Ancient people did not have the statistical mechanisms available today. According to one theory, pigs are not kosher because they were worshipped by the Egyptians. Also (later, but important) the Greeks. Another theory is that raising pigs forces compromises in your lifestyle. Pigs cannot be driven the way cattle, sheep, and goats are; if you are going to raise pigs, you are going to have to stay put. A pastoral people that takes to raising pigs will settle down and become too much like its farming neighbors. I read someplace that the reason being that because pigs are closely related to humans and can transmit the greatest number of pathogens because of this, but I have never read anything else that substantiated that point of view. Em ----- When in trouble or in doubt, Run in circles, scream and shout. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter