Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Jaszewski wrote:
On 30 Jun 2005 08:10:02 -0700, wrote: "Perhaps you could display a little more than ignorance of Usenet and check some of the postings from Kanter. Just an ounce of skill and you'd find he's being spoofed...PUTZ! " Now that Kanter has posted that he did in fact make the post, so who's the ignorant one now, Putz? I haven't read anything like an admission...care to repost with the complete header? Go hump a tree stump, Tom. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"I haven't read anything like an admission...care to repost with the
complete header? " Why don't you learn to use the internet like the rest of us, instead of expecting someone else to do it for you. Ever hear of Google? It's not hard to find if you look instead of shooting off your mouth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:18:01 +0100, Janet Baraclough
wrote: The message .com from contains these words: "I haven't read anything like an admission...care to repost with the complete header? " Why don't you learn to use the internet like the rest of us, instead of expecting someone else to do it for you. This is usenet, where other people include the attribution of posts they quote, and indents identify quoted sections. Janet And the bravest of posters hide behind a nome de plume.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
" No problems with Google here Chet boy...perhaps you should read and
search before you spew... " Apparently you do have a problem reading threads, otherwise you'd have seen this, before you called me a putz. And even now, instead of appologizing you pretend it never happened. So, I think it's quite obvious who's the real putz here. Doug Kanter Jun 30, 8:38 am show options Newsgroups: alt.home.lawn.garden, rec.gardens From: "Doug Kanter" - Find messages by this author Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:38:06 GMT Local: Thurs,Jun 30 2005 8:38 am Subject: Pesticides, politics and oral favors Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse "Tom Jaszewski" wrote in message ... On 28 Jun 2005 18:21:55 -0700, wrote: Oh, wow imagine that! The govt allowed industry to "play a role in shaping the EPA decision." I would have thought they would just take input from guys like Doug Kanter, after all, he's quite an expert. He's a real renaissance man who can tell everyone how to have a beautiful lawn without any chemicals, calls lawn care professionals thugs, and even has time to advocate poisoning neighbors pets and making bigotted remarks about the handicapped. Why should anyone doubt Doug? LOL Perhaps you could display a little more than ignorance of Usenet and check some of the postings from Kanter. Just an ounce of skill and you'd find he's being spoofed...PUTZ! Actually, I *did* post the article. But, trader4 is young, and has missed 40 years worth of chemical industry antics. He doesn't understand how they operate. Not only that, but he doesn't understand how legislation (and legislators) are manipulated by the industries which are affected by potential new laws. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
If you spent half as much time responding to the questions you're afraid to
answer, you might learn something. But hey...the world needs pussies, or the brave would not stand out as much. Here we go again: If chemical companies use animal tests and "find" that the animals are not harmed by chemicals, they declare the tests to be conclusive. If another researcher uses animal tests with the exact same chemical product, and the animals get sick, the manufacturers say animal tests are not valid because animals don't react to chemicals in the same way as humans. Both cannot be correct. So, what's up with this situation? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug Kanter" posted:
If chemical companies use animal tests and "find" that the animals are not harmed by chemicals, they declare the tests to be conclusive. If another researcher uses animal tests with the exact same chemical product, and the animals get sick, the manufacturers say animal tests are not valid because animals don't react to chemicals in the same way as humans. Both cannot be correct. So, what's up with this situation? Or the other situation, that Ronald Reagan fires the FDA coordinator, hires a new one on advise of his buddy Mister Aspartame (Donald Rumsfeld), and was a Defense Contractor that worked for Donald. Arthur Hull Hayes FDA Commissioner hired in 1981 fired in 1983 for accepting corporate gifts in exchange of his approvals for drugs. went to work for G.D. Searle & Company, (as a medical advisor) (Donald Rumsfeld is CEO of this company) The approval of drug by the FDA was based upon firing the FDA commissioner, and putting in a new commissioner that would approve the chemical known as aspartame. He based his approval upon reports presented by the company that manufactured aspartame, G.D. Searle & Company (of which Donald Rumsfeld was a CEO). Boy it sures does swing in a very tight circle there. And the guy was FIRED for accepting gifts. He then went to work for Donald Rumsfeld again, as a "medical professional". That's a VERY TIGHT circle there, where the people approving things are hired because they WILL APPROVE, and hired because they work FOR a company that needs approval. -- Jim Carlock Please post replies to newsgroup. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
For more comments on how agriculture is shaping the evolution and
destruction of species, you may find this essay interesting: "On the Semantics of Evolution". http://www.ergonica.com/downloads.htm. EWIRM: Nature makes plants, humans make weeds! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Kanter wrote:
But hey...the world needs pussies, or the brave would not stand out as much. You should know, puss. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"G Henslee" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: But hey...the world needs pussies, or the brave would not stand out as much. You should know, puss. Oh good....another sap, falling asleep with an empty six pack. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|