Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Programmable thermostat for greenhouse
Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for
a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
There's Charley's GH and also Grainger's Both are online.
K Barrett wrote in message ... Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? After more than thirty yers of growing in a GH, I have had umteen units , in ALL price ranges, with cheap ones lasting as long as the expensive ones, and currently I have a digital which can regulate 4 different time intervals, and cost about 1/3 of the top of the line-works just fine. See at Sears. Wilford Neptune |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
After more than 30 years of orchid growing, I still vote with "old-timers"
that taught me way-back-when, and support NOT artificially raising the daytime temperature of greenhouses, but letting solar heat gain do the work. Light is a more important factor to healthy plant growth than is warmth. Artificially warming the GH on gray days will result in leggy, soft growth that in extreme cases cannot support its own weight, let alone that of added blossoms. Save your money and buy a single-setpoint thermostat, set it to the minimum temperature you'd like your plants to experience, and let it go at that. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. wrote in message ... Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ray,
Thanks for the comments. Here in Vancouver BC if I would let the solar heat do my heating for me during the winter I would be looking at growing just Cymbidiums and even then marginally. As my gh is on the north side of the house, in winter partially shaded by the house, on a property that is the second highest point in Vancouver, you can see why I need to raise my temperatures to some realistic figures Also I use HPS lights during the winter. I agree with you that light is more important than temperature except when the temperature is too low. If the plants are too cold then no amount of light will make them grow. The reason I want a programmable is that so I can set the max, but more importantly the minimum temperature so in case it gets very cold I can have three heaters running instead of just two as I do now using single point thermostats and timers. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:34:14 -0400, "Ray" wrote: After more than 30 years of orchid growing, I still vote with "old-timers" that taught me way-back-when, and support NOT artificially raising the daytime temperature of greenhouses, but letting solar heat gain do the work. Light is a more important factor to healthy plant growth than is warmth. Artificially warming the GH on gray days will result in leggy, soft growth that in extreme cases cannot support its own weight, let alone that of added blossoms. Save your money and buy a single-setpoint thermostat, set it to the minimum temperature you'd like your plants to experience, and let it go at that. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ah HAH! Where you are living plays no role in my analysis of the
situation, but that "minor detail" of the HPS lighting makes a big difference! As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. wrote in message ... Ray, Thanks for the comments. Here in Vancouver BC if I would let the solar heat do my heating for me during the winter I would be looking at growing just Cymbidiums and even then marginally. As my gh is on the north side of the house, in winter partially shaded by the house, on a property that is the second highest point in Vancouver, you can see why I need to raise my temperatures to some realistic figures Also I use HPS lights during the winter. I agree with you that light is more important than temperature except when the temperature is too low. If the plants are too cold then no amount of light will make them grow. The reason I want a programmable is that so I can set the max, but more importantly the minimum temperature so in case it gets very cold I can have three heaters running instead of just two as I do now using single point thermostats and timers. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:34:14 -0400, "Ray" wrote: After more than 30 years of orchid growing, I still vote with "old-timers" that taught me way-back-when, and support NOT artificially raising the daytime temperature of greenhouses, but letting solar heat gain do the work. Light is a more important factor to healthy plant growth than is warmth. Artificially warming the GH on gray days will result in leggy, soft growth that in extreme cases cannot support its own weight, let alone that of added blossoms. Save your money and buy a single-setpoint thermostat, set it to the minimum temperature you'd like your plants to experience, and let it go at that. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What exactly do you mean "on the cool side" ?
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:49:13 -0400, "Ray" wrote: As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Think of "on the cool side" this way: if your plant can typically be
expected to see daytime temperatures between 65°F and 85°F, for the same light intensity, growing it at 70° will give "better" plants than if they are grown at 80°. Let me explain the (probably oversimplified) logic. Please keep in mind that these are generalities, and the applications to individual plants is quite varied. More light results in greater generation of food and energy, and their assimilation into the plant. Higher temperatures result in faster metabolism, hence growth, with the accompanying consumption of those reserves. The application of more light intensity, however, is accompanied by increased localized heating of the plant tissues, and too much can be bad for the plant, even if not outright damaging. By having the environment be a bit cooler, it offsets that heating effect to a degree. If we consider that the plant's metabolism will also be reduced by the cooler temperatures, we can see that those conditions will give the plant an opportunity to benefit from making and storing more reserves while expending less on vegetative growth - hence a sturdier plant that has more energy for blossoms. I also am aware of (but will not claim to "know" anything about) differences in tissue growth rates effected by light levels - cell walls thicker in higher light, cells elongated and thinner-walled in low light - which explain the "soft and leggy" comment I made in an earlier post, but I'm sure there's someone else out there who can explain that better than I. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. wrote in message ... What exactly do you mean "on the cool side" ? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:49:13 -0400, "Ray" wrote: As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Think of "on the cool side" this way: if your plant can typically be
expected to see daytime temperatures between 65°F and 85°F, for the same light intensity, growing it at 70° will give "better" plants than if they are grown at 80°. Let me explain the (probably oversimplified) logic. Please keep in mind that these are generalities, and the applications to individual plants is quite varied. More light results in greater generation of food and energy, and their assimilation into the plant. Higher temperatures result in faster metabolism, hence growth, with the accompanying consumption of those reserves. The application of more light intensity, however, is accompanied by increased localized heating of the plant tissues, and too much can be bad for the plant, even if not outright damaging. By having the environment be a bit cooler, it offsets that heating effect to a degree. If we consider that the plant's metabolism will also be reduced by the cooler temperatures, we can see that those conditions will give the plant an opportunity to benefit from making and storing more reserves while expending less on vegetative growth - hence a sturdier plant that has more energy for blossoms. I also am aware of (but will not claim to "know" anything about) differences in tissue growth rates effected by light levels - cell walls thicker in higher light, cells elongated and thinner-walled in low light - which explain the "soft and leggy" comment I made in an earlier post, but I'm sure there's someone else out there who can explain that better than I. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. wrote in message ... What exactly do you mean "on the cool side" ? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:49:13 -0400, "Ray" wrote: As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Just another data point. We run with two heating set points. But the
criteria for which one is in effect is not the time of day, but the amount of light in the greenhouse. Nights and cloudy days get the lower set point temp and the brighter light (above 1000 foot candles) is given a set point of about 5 - 8 degrees higher. In most cases the normal warming of the sun is enough to warm the greenhouse to the light set point. But on really cold days when the heat lost is greater than the solar gain, the second set point kicks in. For my greenhouse in Va, the second set point becomes important when outside daily high temps are somewhere in the low teens or single digits (the wind plays a big factor). Some of my greenhouse are computer controlled and they take care of themselves. In the other greenhouses, I just bump the thermostat up for three or four hours in the middle of the bright very cold days. The need for the light set point is just not needed very often here and I am in a colder location than Ray. But if I was putting up a greenhouse in say MI, this could be much more important. Pat "Ray" wrote in message ... Ah HAH! Where you are living plays no role in my analysis of the situation, but that "minor detail" of the HPS lighting makes a big difference! As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! . wrote in message ... Ray, Thanks for the comments. Here in Vancouver BC if I would let the solar heat do my heating for me during the winter I would be looking at growing just Cymbidiums and even then marginally. As my gh is on the north side of the house, in winter partially shaded by the house, on a property that is the second highest point in Vancouver, you can see why I need to raise my temperatures to some realistic figures Also I use HPS lights during the winter. I agree with you that light is more important than temperature except when the temperature is too low. If the plants are too cold then no amount of light will make them grow. The reason I want a programmable is that so I can set the max, but more importantly the minimum temperature so in case it gets very cold I can have three heaters running instead of just two as I do now using single point thermostats and timers. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:34:14 -0400, "Ray" wrote: After more than 30 years of orchid growing, I still vote with "old-timers" that taught me way-back-when, and support NOT artificially raising the daytime temperature of greenhouses, but letting solar heat gain do the work. Light is a more important factor to healthy plant growth than is warmth. Artificially warming the GH on gray days will result in leggy, soft growth that in extreme cases cannot support its own weight, let alone that of added blossoms. Save your money and buy a single-setpoint thermostat, set it to the minimum temperature you'd like your plants to experience, and let it go at that. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ah HAH! Where you are living plays no role in my analysis of the
situation, but that "minor detail" of the HPS lighting makes a big difference! As to the light versus temperature thing, you're right that at some point it's just too cold, but growing most plants on the cool side of their normal temperature range with high light levels will actually give fantastic results. Not that I am capable of that on a regular basis, mind you... -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. wrote in message ... Ray, Thanks for the comments. Here in Vancouver BC if I would let the solar heat do my heating for me during the winter I would be looking at growing just Cymbidiums and even then marginally. As my gh is on the north side of the house, in winter partially shaded by the house, on a property that is the second highest point in Vancouver, you can see why I need to raise my temperatures to some realistic figures Also I use HPS lights during the winter. I agree with you that light is more important than temperature except when the temperature is too low. If the plants are too cold then no amount of light will make them grow. The reason I want a programmable is that so I can set the max, but more importantly the minimum temperature so in case it gets very cold I can have three heaters running instead of just two as I do now using single point thermostats and timers. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:34:14 -0400, "Ray" wrote: After more than 30 years of orchid growing, I still vote with "old-timers" that taught me way-back-when, and support NOT artificially raising the daytime temperature of greenhouses, but letting solar heat gain do the work. Light is a more important factor to healthy plant growth than is warmth. Artificially warming the GH on gray days will result in leggy, soft growth that in extreme cases cannot support its own weight, let alone that of added blossoms. Save your money and buy a single-setpoint thermostat, set it to the minimum temperature you'd like your plants to experience, and let it go at that. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Try this page
http://www6.mailordercentral.com/igc....asp?dept=1022 . If it's not there, then I don't know where else to find it. I particularly like the computer controlled system. It's trustworthy enough to go away for a week or 2 and not come back to dead plants. Gary wrote in message ... Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I live in New England. My GH is also on the north side of my home. It receives
no direct sun during Nov, Dec, and Jan. I have two temp zones, and maintain a min nite temp of 46F in one, and 60F in the other one. I heat to keep the min temp at night, and a min temp of 10F higher during the day. Rarely does the temp go higher than the set temp on the thermostat. I have always stressed that light is the most important factor in flower production, and to make up for my decreased light, due to area, and location, I use high output lights for supplemental lighting the entire year, in both zones. I grow 155 genera, and although all of us can always do better, I seem to have done fairly well with this set up. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My mentor just bought a millivolt one at Home Depot $25(RightAid brand)sp?
He said it works like a charm that the only downfall, if you will, is that it has batteries to run the digital program. He has been growing orchids in a g/h for over 50yrs & has had one thermostat all that time. Maybe we should be looking into that manufacturer? *g* -- Cheers Wendy Remove PETERPAN for email reply wrote: Does anyone have a source for a waterproof programmable termostat for a greenhouse that can control a 110v heater? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heater Thermostat Inaccuracy | United Kingdom | |||
water temperature thermostat | United Kingdom | |||
[IBC] Heater Thermostat With 15F-25F Range? | Bonsai | |||
Reverse thermostat | United Kingdom | |||
Good value thermostat wanted | United Kingdom |