Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos
In article , Icarus
writes Comments welcome. On the wild flowers page you could use ALT tags to indicate (some browsers flash up the ALT tag contents when you place the mouse over an image) what the flowers are, or otherwise label the images. Pictures of anonymous flowers aren't going to be very popular with search engines. There's also the point that the page takes several minutes to load. (Yes I know some of my pages are guilty of this as well.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley http://www.malvaceae.info/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos
Reminds me of that song by the Beatles, "Lucy In The Sky
With Diamonds". I agree, that a person should be standing next to it to let people see it's relative size. Would make the picture all that more impressive. I agree about the ALT tags as well, but I see you already have them in place. I would put the ALT text underneath the pictures as well. Maybe in an 8pt Arial, sans-serif font. I usually create a style to do this... !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd" html head meta name="Description" content="Impressive hogweed on the river banks." / style type="text/css"!-- /* font-size */ ..fs8 { font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; } --/style /head body div align="center" img src="picturename.jpg" border="0" alt="Picture of you." title="Picture of you." /br / span class="fs8"Picture of you./span /div /body Note: The code above is coded for XHTML Transitional and is 100% browser compatible with all browsers that I know of. I don't think HTML will ever disappear, but I got in the habit of programming HTML with XML and then they came out with the XHTML standards and everything I do currently is XHTML Transitional as specified by the DOCTYPE tag. All web documents should have a DOCTYPE tag as the first tag on the webpage. Microsoft doesn't support the DOCTYPE tag with FrontPage (at least not in the XP version or any version prior) even though the DOCTYPE tag has been in place since approximately 1999. http://y2u.co.uk/&002_Images/Hogweed%2001.htm Nice webpage and nice pics. I do not have a problem with the speed of the page. :-) Everything looks quite nice. -- Jim Carlock http://www.votetoimpeach.org/ Post replies to the newsgroup. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote: On the wild flowers page you could use ALT tags to indicate (some browsers flash up the ALT tag contents when you place the mouse over an image) what the flowers are, or otherwise label the images. Pictures of anonymous flowers aren't going to be very popular with search engines. There's also the point that the page takes several minutes to load. (Yes I know some of my pages are guilty of this as well.) http://www.malvaceae.info/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos
Hi Jim and everyone
Thanks for the advice Like your pages on http://www.malvaceae.info/ Peace Icarus --------------------------------------------- "Jim Carlock" wrote in message . com... Reminds me of that song by the Beatles, "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds". I agree, that a person should be standing next to it to let people see it's relative size. Would make the picture all that more impressive. I agree about the ALT tags as well, but I see you already have them in place. I would put the ALT text underneath the pictures as well. Maybe in an 8pt Arial, sans-serif font. I usually create a style to do this... !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd" html head meta name="Description" content="Impressive hogweed on the river banks." / style type="text/css"!-- /* font-size */ .fs8 { font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; } --/style /head body div align="center" img src="picturename.jpg" border="0" alt="Picture of you." title="Picture of you." /br / span class="fs8"Picture of you./span /div /body Note: The code above is coded for XHTML Transitional and is 100% browser compatible with all browsers that I know of. I don't think HTML will ever disappear, but I got in the habit of programming HTML with XML and then they came out with the XHTML standards and everything I do currently is XHTML Transitional as specified by the DOCTYPE tag. All web documents should have a DOCTYPE tag as the first tag on the webpage. Microsoft doesn't support the DOCTYPE tag with FrontPage (at least not in the XP version or any version prior) even though the DOCTYPE tag has been in place since approximately 1999. http://y2u.co.uk/&002_Images/Hogweed%2001.htm Nice webpage and nice pics. I do not have a problem with the speed of the page. :-) Everything looks quite nice. -- Jim Carlock http://www.votetoimpeach.org/ Post replies to the newsgroup. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote: On the wild flowers page you could use ALT tags to indicate (some browsers flash up the ALT tag contents when you place the mouse over an image) what the flowers are, or otherwise label the images. Pictures of anonymous flowers aren't going to be very popular with search engines. There's also the point that the page takes several minutes to load. (Yes I know some of my pages are guilty of this as well.) http://www.malvaceae.info/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Giant Hogweed - Photos | Plant Biology | |||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos | United Kingdom | |||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos | United Kingdom | |||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos | Gardening | |||
Giant Hogweed - Some photos | Plant Science |