GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Plant Science (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/plant-science/)
-   -   Petopentia or Pentopetia (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/plant-science/82074-petopentia-pentopetia.html)

IntarsiaCo 20-08-2004 12:06 PM

Petopentia or Pentopetia
 
Is the correct name for a plant received as Fockea tugelensis Petopentia
natalensis or Pentopetia natalensis?

Iris Cohen 20-08-2004 01:34 PM

Is the correct name for a plant received as Fockea tugelensis Petopentia
natalensis or Pentopetia natalensis?

Pentopetia natalensis Schlechter, Journal of Botany (London) 32: 257 (1894),
34: 315 (1896)

You're on AOL. Next time you have a question like that, just type the name in
that field on the toolbar. It will tell you everything.
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)

Iris Cohen 20-08-2004 01:57 PM

I better correct this fast, before Cereoid kills me.
Fockea tugelensis is Petopentia natalensis. He explained it all in an article
for the Maryland cactus & succulent journal.
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)

P van Rijckevorsel 20-08-2004 03:41 PM

Iris Cohen schreef
I better correct this fast, before Cereoid kills me.

Fockea tugelensis is Petopentia natalensis. He explained it all in an
article for the Maryland cactus & succulent journal.

* * *
I see, one of those cases where a species is removed from a genus into a
newly created genus. The latter gets a name that expresses the close
relationship to the former genus. In this case an anagram of the existing
name. Quite awhile ago, too (fifty years now).
PvR





Cereus-validus 22-08-2004 08:41 PM

http://www.cactus-mall.com/clubs/fockea.html


"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
Is the correct name for a plant received as Fockea tugelensis Petopentia
natalensis or Pentopetia natalensis?




Cereus-validus 22-08-2004 08:43 PM

She's dead, Jim!!!

http://www.cactus-mall.com/clubs/fockea.html


"Iris Cohen" wrote in message
...
I better correct this fast, before Cereoid kills me.
Fockea tugelensis is Petopentia natalensis. He explained it all in an

article
for the Maryland cactus & succulent journal.
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)




P van Rijckevorsel 22-08-2004 09:55 PM

Cereus-validus schreef
She's dead, Jim!!!


* * *
Killing off the few people who admit to voluntarily having read something by
your hand (and are even so kind not to comment on its inadequacies) must
help your popularity no end?
PvR




Cereus-validus 22-08-2004 11:38 PM

Poor Rinkytink. You have obviously lived such a sheltered life in the mud
hut of your that the meaning of the joke was completely lost on you because
you have never seen Star Trek.

That you are even able to run your little computer on a gasoline powered
generator quite amazing.


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Cereus-validus schreef
She's dead, Jim!!!


* * *
Killing off the few people who admit to voluntarily having read something

by
your hand (and are even so kind not to comment on its inadequacies) must
help your popularity no end?
PvR






IntarsiaCo 23-08-2004 12:30 AM

http://www.cactus-mall.com/clubs/fockea.html

Petopentia natalensis or Tacazzea natalensis?

Iris Cohen 23-08-2004 03:04 AM

"Plants in cultivation as Fockea tugelensis have proven not to be that species
but are actually another caudiciforn not at all closely related and correctly
named Petopentia natalensis (Schlechter) Bullock."

So why am I dead? I should have worded it more carefully that the two are not
actually the same species, but one of them has been misidentified.
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)

P van Rijckevorsel 23-08-2004 09:44 AM

Cereus-validus schreef
You have obviously lived such a sheltered life in the mud hut of your that

the meaning of the joke was completely lost on you because you have never
seen Star Trek.

* * *
I get the message: we should ignore your postings because they are just
"jokes" you make to yourself.

Hint: if you kept the results of your self-satisfying typing safely home on
your own harddisk it could avoid a lot of irritation by people who
mistakenly think they should read your postings.
PvR





Cereus-validus 23-08-2004 11:22 AM

In reference to what?

Tacazzea natalensis may be a synonym but Petopentia natalensis is the
accepted correct name for the species.


"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
http://www.cactus-mall.com/clubs/fockea.html


Petopentia natalensis or Tacazzea natalensis?




Cereus-validus 23-08-2004 11:24 AM

Dead in the water. You were lost but now you are found! You have finally
seen the light!!!

The plant was never Fockea tugelense at all!!!

If you had ever seen the plant, you would have noticed that neither the
leaves nor the flowers look anything like those of a Fockea.


"Iris Cohen" wrote in message
...
"Plants in cultivation as Fockea tugelensis have proven not to be that

species
but are actually another caudiciforn not at all closely related and

correctly
named Petopentia natalensis (Schlechter) Bullock."

So why am I dead? I should have worded it more carefully that the two are

not
actually the same species, but one of them has been misidentified.
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)




Cereus-validus 23-08-2004 11:32 AM

Nobody was talking to you anyway, Rinkytink, you party crasher. You are one
of those rude dudes who likes to interrupt conversations with inane
irrelevant comments and self promotion that disrupts the flow of discourse
and adds nothing to the sharing of knowledge. Why don't you just mosey up to
the bar, get yourself another rum and coke, sit down and behave yourself?


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Cereus-validus schreef
You have obviously lived such a sheltered life in the mud hut of your

that
the meaning of the joke was completely lost on you because you have never
seen Star Trek.

* * *
I get the message: we should ignore your postings because they are just
"jokes" you make to yourself.

Hint: if you kept the results of your self-satisfying typing safely home

on
your own harddisk it could avoid a lot of irritation by people who
mistakenly think they should read your postings.
PvR







P van Rijckevorsel 23-08-2004 02:19 PM

There you go again, telling us all sorts of thing about your private life we
did not want to know ...

Cereus-validus schreef
Nobody was talking to you anyway, Rinkytink, you party crasher. You are

one of those rude dudes who likes to interrupt conversations with inane
irrelevant comments and self promotion that disrupts the flow of discourse
and adds nothing to the sharing of knowledge. Why don't you just mosey up

to the bar, get yourself another rum and coke, sit down and behave yourself?







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter