#1   Report Post  
Old 25-12-2007, 09:08 PM posted to rec.ponds
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
Default Backness!

free? or ?intellectually free? since
political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts,
and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the
suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was
regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with
was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to
diminish the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted
by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.

Newspeak was founded on the English language as we now know it, though
many Newspeak sentences, even when not containing newly-created words,
would be barely intelligible to an English-speaker of our own day.
Newspeak words were divided into three distinct classes, known as the A
vocabulary, the B vocabulary (also called compound words), and the C
vocabulary. It will be simpler to discuss each class separately, but the
grammatical peculiarities of the language can be dealt with in the
section devoted to the A vocabulary, since the same rules held good for
all three categories.



The A vocabulary. The A vocabulary consisted of the words needed for the
business of everyday life -- for such things as eating, drinking,
working, putting on one?s clothes, going up and down stairs, riding in
vehicles, gardening, cooking, and the like. It was composed almost
entirely of words that we already possess words like hit, run, dog,
tree, sugar, house, field -- but in comparison with the present-day
English vocabulary their number was extremely small, while their
meanings were far more rigidly defined. All ambiguities and shades of
meaning had been purged out of them. So far as it could be achieved, a
Newspeak word of this class was simply a staccato sound expressing one
clearly understood concept. It would have been quite impossible to use
the A vocabulary for literary purposes or for political or philosophical
discussion. It was intended only to express simple, purpo


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Backness! Lord Flame Stryke Ponds 0 25-12-2007 11:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017