GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Ponds (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/ponds/)
-   -   Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/ponds/90993-algae-control-first-take-one-shark-basically-ot.html)

kathy 16-03-2005 12:53 AM

Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT
 
This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....
Sharks have placoid scales, which consist of a rectangular base
embedded in the skin with tiny spines or bristles that poke up from the
surface - the reason a shark's skin feels rough to the touch.
Brennan decided to try mimicking that surface with an artificial
coating to see if it would also have antifouling properties.

His first product: a combination plastic/rubber coating that a
microscope reveals is made of billions of tiny raised diamond-shaped
patterns. Each "sharklet" diamond measures 15 microns, or 15
thousandths of a millimeter, and contains seven raised ribs that at
close examination resemble different lengths of raised horizontal bars.
Laboratory tests show that the coating prevents a very common and
detrimental type of algae, called Ulva, from becoming established
because the algae's spores have great difficulty attaching to the
diamond-shaped configuration.

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm


Hal 16-03-2005 03:56 PM

On 15 Mar 2005 16:53:11 -0800, "kathy" wrote:

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm


Thanks,

Hal

Derek Broughton 16-03-2005 04:14 PM

kathy wrote:

This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....


It is fascinating. That figure only looks at the immediate cost of fuel.
Then there's the cost of regular dry-docking for the addition of expensive
anti-fouling paints & the completely hidden costs to the environment of the
use of anti-fouling paints. Anybody involved with sea-going vessels has
been searching for this sort of solution.
--
derek


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter