GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Roses (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/roses/)
-   -   Hybrid Tea Indoors? (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/roses/97402-hybrid-tea-indoors.html)

Blah 14-07-2005 09:15 AM

Hybrid Tea Indoors?
 
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Henry 14-07-2005 12:10 PM

Blah wrote:
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Unless you have a greenhouse where a plant can receive enough sun, it is
unlikely an rose will do well indoors. They simply need more light than
you can give them. They may live a little while but they will not
thrive not bloom well. There are lots of plants that do well indoors.
Roses don't happen to be among them.

--
Henry

Henry 14-07-2005 12:11 PM

Blah wrote:
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Unless you have a greenhouse where a plant can receive enough sun, it is
unlikely an rose will do well indoors. They simply need more light than
you can give them. They may live a little while but they will not
thrive not bloom well. There are lots of plants that do well indoors.
Roses don't happen to be among them.

--
Henry

dave weil 14-07-2005 04:16 PM

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:11:24 -0400, Henry
wrote:

Blah wrote:
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Unless you have a greenhouse where a plant can receive enough sun, it is
unlikely an rose will do well indoors. They simply need more light than
you can give them. They may live a little while but they will not
thrive not bloom well. There are lots of plants that do well indoors.
Roses don't happen to be among them.


They are also susceptable to the things like afflict other
houseplants, such as spider mites. Generally, air circulation isn't
good enough for roses. If you can master container gardening, you
MIGHT be able to move a potted rose indoors for short periods of time,
but keep in mind that you are exposing your other indoor plants to
possible outdoor pests, and/or exposing your rose to indoor-prone
pests like spider mites. To bring them indoors though means lots of
artificial light (or direct sunlight through a picture window), plus
the fact that roses thrive at much higher "growing season" temps than
the usual low 70s (and low humidity) of the indoors. If you have a
sunroom, you might be able to pull this off, but you might find it
uncomfortable to lounge around in there at temperatures that roses
enjoy. Remember too, that most roses need at least 4-6 hours of direct
sunlight. They also need LOTS of air circulation.

Roses are really outdoor plants, but some have been somewhat
successful at bringing them indoors. It takes a lot of work and a
little bit of luck as well.

Martin 15-07-2005 09:43 AM

Yes HT's can be grown indoors, and can bloom more continuously than outdoor
roses. But you will have your work cut out. You will need space, light and
air in large quantities in addition to the general requirements for good
growing.
To make life easier I would recommend growing miniature indoors and for a
good book on the subject see 'The Complete Book of Miniature Roses' by
Charles Marden Fitch, published by Hawthorn Books Inc, New York and Prentice
Hall, Ontario.

We will cover the subject on our web site eventually but in the meantime see
our web site for general cultural requirements for rose growing at:-
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

Enjoy

Martin Double
Bexrose - Webmaster

Email:
Web Site:
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

"Blah" wrote in message
ups.com...
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.




dave weil 15-07-2005 07:31 PM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:43:59 +0000 (UTC), "Martin"
wrote:

Yes HT's can be grown indoors, and can bloom more continuously than outdoor
roses. But you will have your work cut out. You will need space, light and
air in large quantities in addition to the general requirements for good
growing.
To make life easier I would recommend growing miniature indoors and for a
good book on the subject see 'The Complete Book of Miniature Roses' by
Charles Marden Fitch, published by Hawthorn Books Inc, New York and Prentice
Hall, Ontario.

We will cover the subject on our web site eventually but in the meantime see
our web site for general cultural requirements for rose growing at:-
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

Enjoy

Martin Double
Bexrose - Webmaster

Email:
Web Site:
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

"Blah" wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Just curious. Does anyone find a post like this useful?

Boron Elgar 15-07-2005 08:01 PM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:31:11 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:43:59 +0000 (UTC), "Martin"
wrote:

Yes HT's can be grown indoors, and can bloom more continuously than outdoor
roses. But you will have your work cut out. You will need space, light and
air in large quantities in addition to the general requirements for good
growing.
To make life easier I would recommend growing miniature indoors and for a
good book on the subject see 'The Complete Book of Miniature Roses' by
Charles Marden Fitch, published by Hawthorn Books Inc, New York and Prentice
Hall, Ontario.

We will cover the subject on our web site eventually but in the meantime see
our web site for general cultural requirements for rose growing at:-
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

Enjoy

Martin Double
Bexrose - Webmaster

Email:
Web Site:
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

"Blah" wrote in message
roups.com...
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Just curious. Does anyone find a post like this useful?



I certainly do.

I keep citrus trees indoors in the winter & would love to overwinter a
rose or two. I generally grow roses in tubs on my deck & in the fall
plant them in the rose garden. They do not last the winter unless in
the ground around here. I keep miniatures going all winter indoors. No
problem with them at all.

This year I will have an olive tree indoors, too. Indoor gardening of
large plants can be difficult, as the plants are not in contact with
natural pest predators. They need to be watched carefully or
infestations can destroy them.

Boron

dave weil 15-07-2005 08:15 PM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:01:45 -0400, Boron Elgar
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:31:11 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:43:59 +0000 (UTC), "Martin"
wrote:

Yes HT's can be grown indoors, and can bloom more continuously than outdoor
roses. But you will have your work cut out. You will need space, light and
air in large quantities in addition to the general requirements for good
growing.
To make life easier I would recommend growing miniature indoors and for a
good book on the subject see 'The Complete Book of Miniature Roses' by
Charles Marden Fitch, published by Hawthorn Books Inc, New York and Prentice
Hall, Ontario.

We will cover the subject on our web site eventually but in the meantime see
our web site for general cultural requirements for rose growing at:-
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

Enjoy

Martin Double
Bexrose - Webmaster

Email:
Web Site:
http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose

"Blah" wrote in message
groups.com...
Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.


Just curious. Does anyone find a post like this useful?



I certainly do.

I keep citrus trees indoors in the winter & would love to overwinter a
rose or two. I generally grow roses in tubs on my deck & in the fall
plant them in the rose garden. They do not last the winter unless in
the ground around here. I keep miniatures going all winter indoors. No
problem with them at all.


So, tell me, what information about roses was imparted in this post?
Did you really need the book recommendation that badly?

This year I will have an olive tree indoors, too. Indoor gardening of
large plants can be difficult, as the plants are not in contact with
natural pest predators. They need to be watched carefully or
infestations can destroy them.


Well yes. That's why specific information is helpful, information like
I passed along before this post, this post that had NOTHING specific
about growing roses indoors except that you need "space, light and air
in large quantities". Well, if you needed to know that, then I'd
suggest that you REALLY have your "work cut out for you".

However, I'd maintain that YOUR OWN POST contained more specifics than
the original post.

But I'm glad that you found that post informative "boron".

Boron Elgar 15-07-2005 09:26 PM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:15:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:


But I'm glad that you found that post informative "boron".


You have either been on Usenet too long or not long enough if the two
initial posts caused you such displeasure.

My interest is in finding out that someone else would even attempt the
roses indoors. If that engenders a discussion of any sort whatsoever,
even to the point where my own post has contributed something, however
meager, than it may interest someone else to join into the thread,
too. Other wise the initial post might go unanswered altogether.

This group is not so heavily laden with posts that this thread and its
replies should be taken to task. There is no need to discourage posts
that might stir a good conversation. Some threads need more nurturing
than others to blossom nicely...they are similar to roses in that
respect.

Boron

Tom Line 15-07-2005 10:02 PM


Try those places that sell products used to grow marijuana indoors. I wonder if high tech
hydroponics could produce super roses? They basically use street lights, high pressure sodium
and metal halides. These require external ballasts and produce heat requiring ventilation and
safety precautions.

Blah wrote:
: Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
: than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
: difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
: way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
: up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.
:

--




Tom Line

For Fun And Safety In Firearms Sports visit...
--
http://www.bobtuley.com --


dave weil 16-07-2005 02:05 AM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:26:13 -0400, Boron Elgar
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:15:03 -0500, dave weil
wrote:


But I'm glad that you found that post informative "boron".


You have either been on Usenet too long or not long enough if the two
initial posts caused you such displeasure.


Annoyance might be a better word. And it wasn't the INITIAL post that
was the annoyance. If you thought that, then you're mistaken. You
might find MY response to the post as evidence. I found the initial
post as something that deserved a careful reply.

My interest is in finding out that someone else would even attempt the
roses indoors. If that engenders a discussion of any sort whatsoever,
even to the point where my own post has contributed something, however
meager, than it may interest someone else to join into the thread,
too. Other wise the initial post might go unanswered altogether.


Well, it already hadn't. But, as I said, YOUR own post had more
relevant content than the rather flip and promotional post from Mr.
Double.

This group is not so heavily laden with posts that this thread and its
replies should be taken to task. There is no need to discourage posts
that might stir a good conversation.


Well, that's sort of my point. If a post has something to offer,
that's fine. One might argue that a book recommendation was an
offering. However, the OP wanted info on hybrid teas, so the
helpfulness is questionable.

Some threads need more nurturing
than others to blossom nicely...they are similar to roses in that
respect.


Well yes - they don't need to be buried behind billboards. Or craven
posts either.


dave weil 16-07-2005 02:08 AM

On 15 Jul 2005 17:02:13 -0400, Tom Line wrote:


Try those places that sell products used to grow marijuana indoors. I wonder if high tech
hydroponics could produce super roses? They basically use street lights, high pressure sodium
and metal halides. These require external ballasts and produce heat requiring ventilation and
safety precautions.

Blah wrote:
: Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
: than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
: difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
: way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
: up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.
:


Just be ready for some scrutiny from the authorities, who look for
such purchases, although in quantities necessary to grow a couple of
roses, it might not make a difference.

I suspect that roses wouldn't do very well hydroponically. It has all
of those really fine feeder roots that woudn't probably do well in
water, although it's just an uneducated guess.

Boron Elgar 16-07-2005 03:04 AM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:08:04 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On 15 Jul 2005 17:02:13 -0400, Tom Line wrote:


Try those places that sell products used to grow marijuana indoors. I wonder if high tech
hydroponics could produce super roses? They basically use street lights, high pressure sodium
and metal halides. These require external ballasts and produce heat requiring ventilation and
safety precautions.

Blah wrote:
: Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
: than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
: difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
: way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
: up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.
:


Just be ready for some scrutiny from the authorities, who look for
such purchases, although in quantities necessary to grow a couple of
roses, it might not make a difference.

I suspect that roses wouldn't do very well hydroponically. It has all
of those really fine feeder roots that woudn't probably do well in
water, although it's just an uneducated guess.



They do quite well and are often grown commercially this way.

http://www.hydroponics.com.au/back_issues/issue65.html
http://www.kelleywholesale.com/redgal.html

You can easily google for dozens more sites of hydroponic rose
growers.

boron

dave weil 16-07-2005 03:47 AM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:04:03 -0400, Boron Elgar
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:08:04 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On 15 Jul 2005 17:02:13 -0400, Tom Line wrote:


Try those places that sell products used to grow marijuana indoors. I wonder if high tech
hydroponics could produce super roses? They basically use street lights, high pressure sodium
and metal halides. These require external ballasts and produce heat requiring ventilation and
safety precautions.

Blah wrote:
: Hi, I was wondering whether hybrid teas can be grown and blooms more
: than once annually indoors and how difficult it would be. If its too
: difficult is there a similar rose that can be successfully grown this
: way? I like the miniature roses since the plants themselves won't take
: up much space but I'd prefer a plant that grows large flowers.
:


Just be ready for some scrutiny from the authorities, who look for
such purchases, although in quantities necessary to grow a couple of
roses, it might not make a difference.

I suspect that roses wouldn't do very well hydroponically. It has all
of those really fine feeder roots that woudn't probably do well in
water, although it's just an uneducated guess.



They do quite well and are often grown commercially this way.

http://www.hydroponics.com.au/back_issues/issue65.html
http://www.kelleywholesale.com/redgal.html

You can easily google for dozens more sites of hydroponic rose
growers.

boron


Well, you learn something new every day. Sounds like an operation
that's more suitable for commercial growing though.

So much for uneducated guesses though. They usually don't pan out, as
I have emphatically proven g.

Henry 16-07-2005 01:50 PM

dave weil wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:26:13 -0400, Boron Elgar
wrote:

Some threads need more nurturing
than others to blossom nicely...they are similar to roses in that
respect.



Well yes - they don't need to be buried behind billboards. Or craven
posts either.


I have to agree with Dave on this one. Posts by Martin are all very
similar - a paragraph generally on-topic but very short of specifics and
then a link to his web site. Now, I should say that I don't mind an
occasional link to web sites, even people's own site - I've done it
myself when I had a good picture to share. But linking to his site
seems to be all Mr. Double is here for.

Also, if his site had a lot of really good information or well written
articles by rose experts, then I'd mind less. I've looked over the
bexrose site and it isn't exactly encyclopedic. So, a link once in a
while to such a site would be (way) more than enough. Or a link to a
particular article related to a question. For instance, if Paul Barden
posted a link to his site, referencing a relevant article by himself or
one of his contributors, I'd have no problem with that. But Martin
Double is no Paul Barden. Note: I have no connection with Paul other
than to have learned from many of his fine articles (and once by direct
email).

--
Henry

dave weil 16-07-2005 04:56 PM

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:50:31 -0400, Henry
wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:26:13 -0400, Boron Elgar
wrote:

Some threads need more nurturing
than others to blossom nicely...they are similar to roses in that
respect.



Well yes - they don't need to be buried behind billboards. Or craven
posts either.


I have to agree with Dave on this one. Posts by Martin are all very
similar - a paragraph generally on-topic but very short of specifics and
then a link to his web site. Now, I should say that I don't mind an
occasional link to web sites, even people's own site - I've done it
myself when I had a good picture to share. But linking to his site
seems to be all Mr. Double is here for.

Also, if his site had a lot of really good information or well written
articles by rose experts, then I'd mind less. I've looked over the
bexrose site and it isn't exactly encyclopedic. So, a link once in a
while to such a site would be (way) more than enough. Or a link to a
particular article related to a question. For instance, if Paul Barden
posted a link to his site, referencing a relevant article by himself or
one of his contributors, I'd have no problem with that. But Martin
Double is no Paul Barden. Note: I have no connection with Paul other
than to have learned from many of his fine articles (and once by direct
email).


You summed things up for me nicely.

And let me say this - I have absolutely NO problem with "commercial
links" in signatures, and would have no problem with Martin promoting
his site in the same way. I could just do without the unsupported
hyperbole and the posts whose sole purpose seems to be to get the link
posted, especially when they don't add anything substantial to what's
already been posted.

So, I guess I've said my piece and will probably lay off Mr. Double,
at least for a while g. Hopefully he'll think about putting a little
effort into his posts to make them relevant and let the link follow
organically.

I don't worry about the veterans of the newsgroup, who, in the main
simply ignore him, but I worry about the newbies, who are better
directed to more substantial websites. Perhaps I shouldn't be
concerned about them, but I hope that a side benefit of the small
pressure that I put on Martin will encourage him to make his website
truly competitive with the better sites out there. It's just not even
close. and frankly, given the way that he promotes the site, I'm not
likely to give him hits periodically to check out what kind of
progress he's making, which is sad for him, because it's the folks
like me who stick it out on this newsgroup that supply a steady stream
of income/ego-producing hits over the long haul.

BTW, monthly announcements about updates on the newsletter aren't
really substantive either. Do we really want people with websites to
post such announcements everytime they update their sites? I think
not.

Janie Gordon 16-07-2005 06:04 PM

I grow one along side my fireplace. It has a very large bloom that
always gets compliments...[It's also near a window, but they need
minimal sun.


Blah 19-07-2005 04:26 AM



They are also susceptable to the things like afflict other
houseplants, such as spider mites. Generally, air circulation isn't
good enough for roses. If you can master container gardening, you
MIGHT be able to move a potted rose indoors for short periods of time,
but keep in mind that you are exposing your other indoor plants to
possible outdoor pests, and/or exposing your rose to indoor-prone
pests like spider mites. To bring them indoors though means lots of
artificial light (or direct sunlight through a picture window), plus
the fact that roses thrive at much higher "growing season" temps than
the usual low 70s (and low humidity) of the indoors. If you have a
sunroom, you might be able to pull this off, but you might find it
uncomfortable to lounge around in there at temperatures that roses
enjoy. Remember too, that most roses need at least 4-6 hours of direct
sunlight. They also need LOTS of air circulation.

Roses are really outdoor plants, but some have been somewhat
successful at bringing them indoors. It takes a lot of work and a
little bit of luck as well.


Okay if hybrid teas or other full size roses won't work would there be
suitable miniature varieties that would meet the requirements in my
intial post? What sort of care would it entail? I would be leaning
toward ones that would easily thrive and bloom if possible.


dave weil 19-07-2005 07:46 AM

On 18 Jul 2005 20:26:19 -0700, "Blah" wrote:



They are also susceptable to the things like afflict other
houseplants, such as spider mites. Generally, air circulation isn't
good enough for roses. If you can master container gardening, you
MIGHT be able to move a potted rose indoors for short periods of time,
but keep in mind that you are exposing your other indoor plants to
possible outdoor pests, and/or exposing your rose to indoor-prone
pests like spider mites. To bring them indoors though means lots of
artificial light (or direct sunlight through a picture window), plus
the fact that roses thrive at much higher "growing season" temps than
the usual low 70s (and low humidity) of the indoors. If you have a
sunroom, you might be able to pull this off, but you might find it
uncomfortable to lounge around in there at temperatures that roses
enjoy. Remember too, that most roses need at least 4-6 hours of direct
sunlight. They also need LOTS of air circulation.

Roses are really outdoor plants, but some have been somewhat
successful at bringing them indoors. It takes a lot of work and a
little bit of luck as well.


Okay if hybrid teas or other full size roses won't work would there be
suitable miniature varieties that would meet the requirements in my
intial post? What sort of care would it entail? I would be leaning
toward ones that would easily thrive and bloom if possible.


The same problems hold true for miniature as they do for larger ones,
but it's a little easier to get them more light (because you can get
them closer to the window, and or provide artificial light), PLUS,
it's easier to take them in and out.

If you're looking for a rose to be a permanent indoor plant, I think
you're going to be disappointed. Having said that, a miniature potted
rose is pretty cheap and you can easily replace them as you learn what
works and doesn't work.

Here are the main problems, restated:

Low humidity
Temperature (no variation in temperature)
Lack of light
Lack of "fresh air"/the effect of air conditioning (this is part of
the first two items as well)
Susceptability to spider mites and other indoor problems

All of these can be addressed, but fixing the first two things make it
uncomfortable for the human occupants. Roses CAN be acclimated over
time, but they are finicky little things.

The problem with temperature is the same that plagues orchid growers.
Most orchids need cooler temps at night and roses are no exceptions,
although they don't need the dramatic swings that orchids do.

One thing you could do is to keep them healthy as long as you can and
then if they start to decline, simply transplant them to the garden
and start with a new plant.

Just remember, there's a reason that they're called OUTDOOR plants.

After having written this, I searched for some links that might help
you:

http://www.rosemania.com/Growing_Minis_Indoors.htm
http://www.ars.org/About_Roses/miniatures_indoors.htm
http://www.mgs.md.gov/mdrose/docs/indorminis.pdf


Tom Line 19-07-2005 01:09 PM


Oh those stoners just make up those stories about the marijuana police because they're
mentally impaired and ignorant. I would however recommend against buying about 50 lights, and
renting an entire house for a rose operation using an assumed name.


: Just be ready for some scrutiny from the authorities, who look for
: such purchases, although in quantities necessary to grow a couple of
: roses, it might not make a difference.
:
: I suspect that roses wouldn't do very well hydroponically. It has all
: of those really fine feeder roots that woudn't probably do well in
: water, although it's just an uneducated guess.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter