LAND REFORM, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION
"C R Spinner" wrote in message ... *** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com *** Well there are short term benefits in enabling families to employ themselves in subsistance farming. Terrible news! (to the racist whites in these NGs) I note that reverting to subsistance farming is always people on newsgroups advocate for others. You never see them give up their comfortable existance to do it themselves. This is a rather dishonest comment, to say the least. Clearly Mr. Glur wants us to believe that the short-term effects of violent, uncompensated transfers of land from competent farmers to incompetent thugs are somehow merely the long-term effects of orderly and compensated transfers from larger to smaller competent farmers. Yes. Dishonesty exists all around. The white incompetent thugs who - violently and with no compensation offered - grabbed the ancestral lands in africa did not have a background in farming. The native pastoralists who are reclaiming their ancestral lands will re-discover their pastoral roots that were violently uprooted by, among other knaves, a rat named cecil_rhodes. And they are doing admirably well. Should humanity COMPENSATE crime or the criminals who grabbed the ancestral lands with NO COMPENSATION? Men of goodwill would suggest that the natives deserve rents, restitution and revenge. Thugs are not to be rewarded for their dastardly deeds. The land-grabbing white cutthroats also had a track record in murder, rape, poisoning and trading in human misery. Can/Does humanity overlook the crimes of murder and fraud? Do we observe any time limits on these? Men of goodwill would suggest that the natives deserve just revenge, just retribution. Surely we asserted these rights in Afghanistan after the events of September 11, 2001! How about the particular crime of slave trade? The Jews are heavily compensated for same! Why shouldn't the african? why not the Russians, who were shipped in large numbers into Egypt? Jim Webster |
LAND REFORM, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION
I don't know why they need more land! Some of the most fertile soil in South
Africa lies in the hand of the black community. There is irrigation schemes you name it, all set up for prosperous farming. Before it was given to the black white people lived there and had thriving farming activities going on. There is absolutely no agricultural activities there, all the land is just lying there. Maybe they should first start using the land they do have and then look to get more land. No help looking at other prosperous farmers and say it is all apartheids fault while meantime it is their own stupid fault that they are in the position they are in! C R Spinner wrote in message ... *** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com *** On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:47:16 GMT, wrote: On 26 Apr 2003 09:14:42 GMT, wrote: i) 3. Evidence on the impact of land reform in Zimbabwe A panel survey of resettlement households started in 1983 shows clearly that resettled households' well-being has improved dramatically over the past 20 years ii) The 70,000 households which have so far benefited from land redistribution, represent about 5% of the peasant farmer, but produce between 15 population and 20% of the marketed output of maize and cotton, while also largely satisfying their own food consumption needs (Moyo, 1995). iii) Redistribution efforts so far (3.2 million ha) have had no negative impact on large-scale commercial farm output, given the extent of underutilization of arable land in the large-scale commercial farm sector. Well there are short term benefits in enabling families to employ themselves in subsistance farming. Terrible news! (to the racist whites in these NGs) This is a rather dishonest comment, to say the least. Clearly Mr. Glur wants us to believe that the short-term effects of violent, uncompensated transfers of land from competent farmers to incompetent thugs are somehow merely the long-term effects of orderly and compensated transfers from larger to smaller competent farmers. Yes. Dishonesty exists all around. The white incompetent thugs who - violently and with no compensation offered - grabbed the ancestral lands in africa did not have a background in farming. The native pastoralists who are reclaiming their ancestral lands will re-discover their pastoral roots that were violently uprooted by, among other knaves, a rat named cecil_rhodes. And they are doing admirably well. Should humanity COMPENSATE crime or the criminals who grabbed the ancestral lands with NO COMPENSATION? Men of goodwill would suggest that the natives deserve rents, restitution and revenge. Thugs are not to be rewarded for their dastardly deeds. The land-grabbing white cutthroats also had a track record in murder, rape, poisoning and trading in human misery. Can/Does humanity overlook the crimes of murder and fraud? Do we observe any time limits on these? Men of goodwill would suggest that the natives deserve just revenge, just retribution. Surely we asserted these rights in Afghanistan after the events of September 11, 2001! How about the particular crime of slave trade? The Jews are heavily compensated for same! Why shouldn't the african? Dishonest indeed. -----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeed.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== 100,000 Groups! - 19 Servers! - Unlimited Download! =----- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter