LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old 14-07-2003, 06:22 PM
Jim Webster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?


"Phred" wrote in message
news:beuli5$8t0fg$1@ID-
It might be even worse than that Uncle Al. Over the past few days
here in Oz (the place, not the man) the airwaves have been full of
assertions that scientific creativity and accomplishment cease on
marriage.

Given that so many young blokes and sheilas now shack up at a
relatively early age, will this further reduce prospects for future
human invention; or does it require the formality of wedded bliss to
stiffle discovery?

this ran in the UK as well. Apparently the only advantage is that it also
stifles the criminal urge as well, so we shall perhaps be uninventive but
honest

Jim Webster


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" John Kepler Ponds 0 21-09-2007 09:49 PM
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? Dilip Barman Plant Science 6 17-12-2003 01:04 PM
scientific method is a hoax? Roadrunner Plant Science 8 27-11-2003 01:22 PM
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? Donald L Ferrt alt.forestry 0 11-08-2003 01:13 PM
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? Andi B. sci.agriculture 0 26-04-2003 12:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017