Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
"Phred" wrote in message news:beuli5$8t0fg$1@ID- It might be even worse than that Uncle Al. Over the past few days here in Oz (the place, not the man) the airwaves have been full of assertions that scientific creativity and accomplishment cease on marriage. Given that so many young blokes and sheilas now shack up at a relatively early age, will this further reduce prospects for future human invention; or does it require the formality of wedded bliss to stiffle discovery? this ran in the UK as well. Apparently the only advantage is that it also stifles the criminal urge as well, so we shall perhaps be uninventive but honest Jim Webster |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |