Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
Jeff Utz wrote: Creationism, chiropractic & homeopathy Chiropractic (the non nutty kind) is simply mechanical force applied to the vertebrata to re-allign them. I have used the services of a chiropractor over the years to do a re-alignment when my 4-th lumbar vertebrea decides to lean over and press on the nerves. It is like tuning the mast of a boat. It is applied Newtonian physics and it works for people like me who have lumbego. Chiropractic will do nothing to treat cancer or asthma caused by allergic reactions. No competent chiropractor would claim otherwise. Bob Kolker |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |