Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
Steve Harris wrote:
Beware making fun of science fiction as "science fantasy." Unless of course it contains time machines, FTL drives, force-field "shields", antigravity, Wesley Crusher, or workable libertarian utopias. Then it's okay to laugh all you like. g. I agree with you about libertarian utopias. As do nearly all libertarians. We don't believe in utopias. I'm not so sure about time machines. There are several ways they could exist without creating a paradox. -- Keith F. Lynch - - http://keithlynch.net/ I always welcome replies to my e-mail, postings, and web pages, but unsolicited bulk e-mail (spam) is not acceptable. Please do not send me HTML, "rich text," or attachments, as all such email is discarded unread. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |