Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
"Daniel Prince" wrote in message
... "Steve Harris" wrote: Unless of course it contains time machines, FTL drives, force-field "shields", antigravity, Wesley Crusher, or workable libertarian utopias. Then it's okay to laugh all you like. g. There is one type of force-field "shield" that is possible. It is a magnetic field that can shield a ship or station against certain types of radiation (charged particles only). -- Actually, there is already a force field in use that acts as an air valve (plasma valve). I see no reason why you couldn't create such shields of any arbitrary power (e.g., Star Trek's deflector shields), except, of course, that the power requirements would be beyond insane. http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/2003/bnlpr052803.htm -- New definition of irony: 'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the '30's and '40's - they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". ' -Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |